Terranova, jim lebenthal, josh brown and Pete Najarian. How worried should people be this week for a sector thats made a nice comeback . Not worried at all. The sector is rallying into this dnc and a big difference between word and deed. Very easy to put things in a platform, harder to actually enact them. And history suggests that these things typically dont play out based on the worst case scenario. Most important thing here, scott, technically speaking, look at xpi, equal weight biotech index. A much better measure of the broad sector than the ibb. That is on the verge of a breakout. 60 resistance and a pattern of higher lows. Exactly what you want to see. Sellers are less aggressive. Buyers more aggressive, and once this thing gets going, typically set up for a nice run for a little time. I would not be worried about headlines this week. Theyre just headlines. Theyre not actual policies. Pete, word alone, though, to sort of refute what josh is saying, has already crushed the space
Dropped and of course where we did it. The numbers so so with thanksgiving spending declining from a year ago. All this as socalled cyber monday is now in full swing. So spending down, but seems to be the prevailing thought. It could have been much worse. Well, yeah, that, and then theres some question about are sales that normally would have occurred at the mall or in a Department Store occurring for the same retailer but online. You keep in mind, people are sending out black friday email blasts the day after halloween these days. So it pulls some shopping forward, it pushes some back. Ive seen a study that shows the biggest shopping day is not only black friday but the 23rd of december. So i just think that shopping has changed. Consumer habits is not what they were in the 80s. Im not sure how reliable looking at any one day is as a gauge for anything. There were blowout black friday numbers in 2009 while the economy was still crashing. More people are spending online than they are i
qualified. let s go baying let s go back to the article. in the criticism area he calls her robotic, stuck up, absurd in her obsession with detail and constantly late and cancels meetings and seems fair game to me. i read that business insider article once and read it again and put in the pronoun he instead of she and it read fine to me. he even criticized former acting ceo ross levenson and said how good he looked in his sweater vest. i felt like he did a great job at really trying to humanize her, criticize her and at the same time be fair. at the same time he said she was brilliant and she got traffic up on the yahoo! site. and yet there was a kneejerk reaction saying he is calling her robotic and stuck up and it is sexism. we are never going to win on this until women until there are more women ceo s period.
0 moved on and we see a video, videos of the terrible, horrible 400 children who were gassed and killed that everything changed. pundits started to say, no x we are not going to no, we are not going to do this. reporters, anchors started to have a skeptical tone. what strikes me is often when it comes to president obama you have the gang at msnbc and they are acting as a cheerleading squad, but on this one, chris matthews, ed schulz and others opposing the president on inter veption in syria and i wonder if that says we reached a moment where obama at least on this issue has no friends in the press? strange bedfellow here not only in the press, but in congress. you have people like liz cheney and barbara lee agreeing on this that america shouldn t intervene. some people call it a war and the white house is calling it a military inter veption in president of the united states i want to stay focused on the media. you say he has no moral authority. you are acting as a public dit
it s just an atrocity that s impossible to explain. joining us to examine the coverage of the colorado shooting in minneapolis, political correspondent for the guardian. and here in washington, rame ramesh panuru from political review. bob cusack from political newspaper the hill. bob, why the great rush by abc too report what turned out to be flatly wrong information it the alleged shooter? that s a pretty bad mistake. obviously journalists in that situation, you re doing research, who is this guy you can t say that on television unless you confirm it. especially for such a common name. a bad mistake. i think generally the media did a good job, whether bill o reilly or they went to straight news coverage on this. to make that kind of mistake, quite poor. infuriated the tea party and rightly so. we saw piers morgan a moment ago in the early hours after this tragedy. he tweeted, america has got to do something about its gun laws. then breitbart.com, the conse