fired, that he pushed for a special counsel and in his book tour he says he needs to be credited with triggering that event. right. mark: rosenstein appoints mueller. right. mark: i m a little confused about this as i assume the american people are. rosenstein wrote an extensive memo to the attorney general who passed it onto the president of the united states, and in that memo he cites former attorneys general, former deputies attorneys general, former attorney, former whatever at the department of justice and beyond, condemning comey for what he did in hillary clinton s case in the press conference, right? right. mark: well if he s appointing mueller to investigate, among other things, the firing of comey, is that not a conflict of interest? a major disqualifying conflict of interest that is actually mandatory under federal regulations.
entresto was proven superior at helping people stay alive and out of the hospital. it helps improve your heart s ability to pump blood to the body. don t take entresto if pregnant; it can cause harm or death to an unborn baby. don t take entresto with an ace inhibitor or aliskiren, or if you ve had angioedema with an ace or arb. the most serious side effects are angioedema, low blood pressure, kidney problems, or high blood potassium. ask your doctor about entresto for heart failure. yeah! entrust your heart to entresto. the beat goes on. . mark: gregg jarrett, there is still this cloud that hangs over the white house on whether or not mr. mueller will trigger a subpoena to force the
collusion, whatever that amorphous crime is that is nowhere in the criminal code, you have no legal right or basis or justification for questioning the president of the united states about a noncrime, i think mueller has come to the realization, he knows if he were to slap the subpoena with a president, the president would move in a motion to quash and that mueller would lose in the federal courts. he might win in district court but in front of the united states district supreme court, mueller knows he would lose. which is now why he s relenting to a few questions in writing of the president about what he may or may not know about collusion, but no questions about obstruction of justice. mark: the president has never appeared before a federal grand jury. bill clinton negotiated an out
collusion, whatever that amorphous crime is that is nowhere in the criminal code, you have no legal right or basis or justification for questioning the president of the united states about a noncrime, i think mueller has come to the realization, he knows if he were to slap the subpoena with a president, the president would move in a motion to quash and that mueller would lose in the federal courts. he might win in district court but in front of the united states district supreme court, mueller knows he would lose. which is now why he s relenting to a few questions in writing of the president about what he may or may not know about collusion, but no questions about obstruction of justice. mark: the president has never appeared before a federal grand jury. bill clinton negotiated an out
mean they don t collaborate and collude with each other, perhaps mueller wanted the campaign issue raised in the district of new york. that s possible. why wouldn t they? if their goal is to produce this report for impeachment. let me ask you this, do prosecutors normally produce reports and send them into the department of justice or speak in a courtroom? well, they generally speak in a courtroom, and they let their charges do the talking. mark: now why is that? so people have the right to defend themselves? that is correct, everybody s presumed innocent until proven guilty. but that s not the way this special counsel and his team of part sans are going about the investigation of donald trump. i think you re absolutely right. mueller understands he can t indict a sitting president, so he s doing something else. he s going write a report. the law, notwithstanding, and