over thanksgiving. adolf hitler. he also looked at other temples but they have kept over there pressure across the country. before the attack. in fact, the daily report of talking to a rabbi during a overnight military operations in hanukkah celebration, wounding five people including the rabbi s own son. afghanistan showed yesterday that the u.s. had killed 30 victims still in critical condition. taliban fighters across the when he began the spray, the country. suspect uttered no one is and others were also imprisonede leaving. witnesses got his license plate attacks on u.s. soldiers, the and police tracked him down a manhattan. conflicting statements, what the prosecutor saying he did not would a potential peace deal go home after the alleged attack. look like? he pleaded not guilty to five ali, the key issue is that counts of attempted murder and the taliban would for a bid or burglary. and speaking with him, he was prevent any terror groups from using afghanistan to attack th
statements but their statements are not anything that we can rely on. when they tell you to your face we aren t going to help you, do you think they are kidding? do you think they will really tell us? isis-k, al qaeda and associated forces continue to be. we re talking about the taliban. the taliban has told the united states they will not work with our counter terrorism forces when it comes to al qaeda or isis. what response should we have regarding the taliban when they say that? i think we have a number of different tools available like what? economic sanctions, they need money from the united states states for humanitarian and other reasons. the leverage over the taliban is whether or not we give them money? the job of the justice department is protecting using the f.b.i. and the national security agencies.
0 about a conversation that i m not i m stunned that you can t recall that. so let s talk about afghanistan. the secretary undersecretary for defense policy, mr. kael says, isis-k poses a short term external threat al qaeda could launch attacks outside afghanistan within a year or two. do you agree with that? i agree that al qaeda has always presented and continues to present a persistent threat to the united states homeland. the question is what s changed? you say always. has any recent event changed the likelihood of an attack? i don t know. you don t know that we withdrew from afghanistan. i know we withdrew. i don t no if it will increase the risk from al qaeda or not. you are the attorney general of the united states. due to the lack of ability to have eyes and ears on the ground there was testimony and the unreliability of the taliban that an attack on the united states within six months or a year is far more likely after a withdrawal, you re not aware he said t
into a city in disarray. the taliban s supreme leader called the prisoners political detainees. but they were members of the taliban, al qaeda and isis-k. one of those prisoners was abdul rahman, an isis-k member. 11 days later it was he who carried out the suicide bombing at abbey gate killing 13 u.s. service members and about 170 afghans. officials say he had been released from the prison near bagram air base under u.s. control until it was given to the afghan military this summer and then fell to the taliban. the afghans have run the prison since 2013. the attack underscores the chaotic final days of the end of america s longest war and the risk of a terror threat emerging from afghanistan once again. it s a real possibility in the not too distant future. 6, 12, 18, 24, 34 months for reconstitution of al qaeda or isis. they faced criticism for the decision to abandon bagram, the
go from here, derek that orden, former navy seal who served to tours in afghanistan, congressional candidate for the great state of wisconsin. thank you for having me. mike: the hearings featuring top military generals were pretty devastating. take a listen. there was never a discussion about the plan to defend kabul before its fall? a real possibility for reconstitution of al qaeda or isis. mike: does that mean it s only a matter of time before a commander in chief is forced to go back to afghanistan in some form or fashion? that s a real possibility. do than a malfeasance of the biden administration complete lack of competency, we are essentially sitting at septembe. he did not need to happen. let s remember the biden