strzok was very effective. regardless of what you think about what he did yes, it was inappropriate what he did. given his role in this investigation, he should not have been doing it, but i thought he was pretty effective. do you think this is why they stopped allowing him to answer? when he would get one word out, they would cut him off or make their questions statements instead of questions. sure. let me take you on the other side of this, don. i ve done a lot of hearings in my life. some were friendly. a lot were hostile. before the iraq war i did a lot of hostile hearings with former cia director george tenet. when you re in that situation, especially in an open hearing, when members of congress, republicans and democrats know they re on a camera, one of the questions you have is am i going to walk out of this room making news or not? i don t know mr. strzok, but if i were him walking into this hearing, i d have a simple question. my reputation has been damaged. it s been dama
was watching and looking at trey gowdy s face. i thought strzok was effective. yes it was inappropriate what he did. given his role in the investigation he could not have done it. but i thought he was effect i have. is this why they stopped allowing him to answer? when he would get one word out they would stop him and start making their questions statements? i ve done a lot of hearings in my life, some were friendly, a lot were hostile. before the iraq war i did a lot of hearings with george tenet. when you re in an open hearing with republicans and democrats knowing they re on camera, one question you have is am i going to walk out of this room making news or not? i don t know mr. strzok but i would have a simple question my reputation has been damaged, it s been damaged appropriately, he did things he should not have