Problem. One of the things were looking at is the easy of maintain ability to set up a process that not only weighs the process of the vehicle and the feature. Thats just a quick overview in terms of the brake and the system what are the exchanges. Well, the brake and the system have enter connected, you know, with cables articulated cables that carry basically, the communications. I know i dont mean to answer this in an indirect way but the braking systems are controlled through cables that are train lined through all vehicles in the cup letterheads. The cup letter he heads effect all the new mask systems and some say train control because they carry all the intelligence for the system. The cup letters you occasionally see them exposed and that means that the sensitive cup letters especially on one train theyre not quizzed to the air. So the prepulltion are those primarily design related . Yes, their they are design related. I use if you were to take an intact value which is a credibl
Not with more delays. So thank you very much. Good evening, supervisors. My name is jason henderson, im with the hayes valley neighborhood association. The hvna enthusiastically endorsed this project and we ask that you reject this appeal. Ive participated in multiple meetings on this project. There was a thorough public process. Density has been mentioned. The real problem that we acknowledge in hayes valley is the density of cars is the real problem, not the density of people. In fact, were disappointed that the fell and oak project didnt reduce a lane and look at the whole corridor. But thats another matter and we understand compromise. And so removing the parking was the compromise. And theres no Significant Impact on automobile intersection level of service, as much as i would like us to get away from using that metric, i do understand that metric and this project has thoroughly looked at that. Therefore, there is no impact on transit, the 16x. The impacts on pedestrians is only p
Endorsed this project and we ask that you reject this appeal. Ive participated in multiple meetings on this project. There was a thorough public process. Density has been mentioned. The real problem that we acknowledge in hayes valley is the density of cars is the real problem, not the density of people. In fact, were disappointed that the fell and oak project didnt reduce a lane and look at the whole corridor. But thats another matter and we understand compromise. And so removing the parking was the compromise. And theres no Significant Impact on automobile intersection level of service, as much as i would like us to get away from using that metric, i do understand that metric and this project has thoroughly looked at that. Therefore, there is no impact on transit, the 16x. The impacts on pedestrians is only positive. So theres no significant Environmental Impact there. And the impacts on bicycles is only positive. So theres no Significant Impact there. Some of the other issues raised
Alterations to the existing conditions that namely traded parking for safer travel for bicycles and pedestrians. So with that in mind, we support Planning Department determination of the projects exemption because the appeal does not support our neighborhoods need for improved safety for the residents, or visitors coming into our neighborhood. And this project is very important. It does serve our neighborhood significantly. In fact, delays to this project would be harmful to our safety and were quite concerned about that. So we urge you to always uphold these type of exemptions because, you know, this is how we are able to make improvements to our neighborhood. Thank you. President chiu next speaker please. Good evening, supervisors. Im elizabeth stampe, executive director of walk San Francisco. And im here to encourage you to reject this appeal and affirm the Planning Departments decision to get these improvements happening as soon as possible on fell and oak, to calm traffic, and imp
Eventually approved was something that we were in favor of, which included minor alterations to the existing conditions that namely traded parking for safer travel for bicycles and pedestrians. So with that in mind, we support Planning Department determination of the projects exemption because the appeal does not support our neighborhoods need for improved safety for the residents, or visitors coming into our neighborhood. And this project is very important. It does serve our neighborhood significantly. In fact, delays to this project would be harmful to our safety and were quite concerned about that. So we urge you to always uphold these type of exemptions because, you know, this is how we are able to make improvements to our neighborhood. Thank you. President chiu next speaker please. Good evening, supervisors. Im elizabeth stampe, executive director of walk San Francisco. And im here to encourage you to reject this appeal and affirm the Planning Departments decision to get these imp