i think there s an ability to strike a balance. to strike a balance a more sober tone there. there has been analysis over the weekend maybe this is an opportunity for the republicans, if they can put these issues behind them they can focus on national security and the economied in 2016 election. that is more favorable for them. that is true if they can get across the quick sand. is there reason to believe f you put ten or all 15 or 16 debates, they won t get stuck in them. romney didn t want to say self-deport, but that s where he found himself tugged. is there a reason to believe jindal and others in the debate they can say let s not debate these issues? let s not go right and drive other people away? i would be shocked if this doesn t come up in a debate. you have all these people vying to be on stage. all these tiers, they can t put them all on stage at this point.
some people called it they can call it whatever they want. romney didn t win, did he? president obama on monday visited the new edward m. kennedy institute in boston where lamented that our politics are not more purposeful and elevated. i wonder if president obama who has lamented this instability in our politics, this disrespect in our politics has any view of harry reid telling dana bash in response to this question, well, romney didn t get elected did he? obviously senator reid is somebody who s going to decide for himself about what he says on the senate floor. the president s choice and his spokesman s choice to call out conduct unbecoming of our highest elected officials when it is in fact unbecoming. are you going to take that opportunity now? not for something that s three years old. and to many that answer echoed the answer that former obama spokesman tomny veeter gave to fox news s bret baier
has any view of harry reid telling dana bash in response to this question, well, romney didn t get elected did he? obviously senator reid is somebody who s going to decide for himself about what he says on the senate floor. the president s choice and his spokesman s choice to call out conduct unbecoming of our highest elected officials when it is in fact unbecoming. are you going to take that opportunity now? not for something that s three years old. and to many that answer echoed the answer that former obama spokesman tomny veeter gave to fox news s bret baier when the latter asked about benghazi on television and he answered, dude that s like three years ago. megyn. there s a statute of limitations on unethical behavior. james, good to know. learn something new everyday. joining me now with more, dana perino co-host of the five here on fnc. so president obama it was three years ago, that s what the white house is saying. i think it would have been very easy for the whit
they can call it whatever they want. romney didn t win, did he? president obama on monday visited the new edward m. kennedy institute in boston where lamented that our politics are not more purposeful and elevated. i wonder if president obama who has lamented this instability in our politics, this disrespect in our politics has any view of harry reid telling dana bash in response to this question, well, romney didn t get elected did he? obviously senator reid is somebody who s going to decide for himself about what he says on the senate floor. the president s choice and his spokesman s choice to call out conduct unbecoming of our highest elected officials when it is in fact unbecoming. are you going to take that opportunity now? not for something that s three years old. and to many that answer echoed the answer that former obama spokesman tomny veeter gave to fox news s bret baier
oh, wait it was won two years ago when everybody dumped all of their money there before letting the free market play itself out. romney was brutalized in the primary. i think he was put through the wringer. here s the deal. mitt romney was bullied. he had all the money. he had no money. i worked for him. we didn t get paid. come on. you know what if romney didn t have enough money to destroy newt gingrich before iowa and didn t have enough money to destroy newt gingrich before south carolina, before florida, he would have been out but he had the money and the money always sustains them through crappy starts. it turns to the midwest and the northeast and then suddenly you just start signing checks, start signing checks. all of these people that have a good start all fade away. if that s your republican party, party the democrats are already into hillary. i think we re the same side. okay.