wikileaks had after july 22nd, 2016. i do agree that roger wanted me to find out from wikileaks. i never had any contact with julian assange directly or indirectly. so my communications with roger in july and august 2016 about what i thought assange had were really speculation on my part connecting the dots. stone e-mailed you asking you to, quote, get the pending wikileaks e-mails that could have damaging information about hillary clinton. you replied a week later saying, quote, word is friend in embassy, that s assange, plans two more dumps. impact planned to be very damaging. would not hurt to start suggesting hillary clinton old memory bad, has stroke. neither he nor she while referring to hillary clinton and bill. next dump folk urks setting stage for foundation debacle.
russian state hacker according to u.s. intelligence agencies. on friday, person number 1 revealed his identity. it s jerome corsi who joins me now. he requested his lawyer larry clayman be present as well. mr. corsi, thanks for joining us. you say that the information in the mueller indictment is accurate and that roger stone needs to tell the truth. he s facing serious consequences, of course, but he continues to insist he s innocent and is going to plead not guilty. what do you think his motivation is for not telling the truth? well, i am not very good at telling someone else s motivation so i can t really answer what roger s motivation is. i know my motivation is to tell the truth, and i will affirm that what is in the indictment about me is accurate. and i will affirm that, if asked to in court. one of the that means you re willing to testify against roger stone, theoretically, if need be. you ll affirm what s in the indictment is correct. i ll be happy to testify i
for the timing of the wikileaks dump right after the access hollywood tape. i don t think it was specifically that i was referring to. i had i believe figured out that assange had podesta s e-mails. i did tell this not only to roger but to others. and it turned out that i was right. now that was deduction on my part as best i can remember. putting together the dots. but i felt like that should have been valuable information, just that i figged it out. not that i had communications with wikileaks. and he worked with randy credico because i don t think roger ever believed. i don t recall roger thinking, if i had a contact with wikileaks, i think roger would have leapfrogged me immediately and taken the contact himself. all right. jerome corsi, thanks for s answering our questions today. could a democrat from texas be the right candidate to take on trump in 2020. julian castro will be here in moments.
would suspect to be subpoenaed, and i ll let the testimony fall wherever it falls. i m going to tell the truth to the best of my ability. even that s hard given the amount of information and the fact that i have said from the beginning i m not a human tape recorder. you can t push a button and i can t recall precisely in detail granularly e-mails and conversations from 2016 but i m going to do my best to tell the truth without calculation of whom it benefits or whom it detracts. first, one of the biggest outstanding questions from this indictment comes from a line that says, quote, a senior trump campaign official was, quote, directed to contact stone to find out about any additional wikileaks releases. do you know who directed that senior campaign official to talk with roger stone? do you know who either of these individuals are? i really don t. i mean, i know what roger told me, but i don t recall that roger ever said he was under instructions from anyone in the campaign to find
i believe it was october, what, 7th or 8th? at any rate, the day wikileaks released the first of the podesta e-mails, as my recollection that roger mentioned this billy bush was coming and he wanted to know if assange could begin dropping e-mails. now roger may have a different recollection of that. i m not disputing what roger s recollection is. i can only tell you what my recollection is. and i doucbt anything was able o be communicated by the world net daily staff. as we look through that day, i was it was a very busy day for me in new york city. i was working with a lot of conference calls and a lot of different meetings. so but i can t find anyone that i was communicate with who had any direct contact with assange because i didn t have direct contact. let me ask you, last question, you e-mailed roger stone to say you, quote, should be given credit, according to an e-mail the prosecutors have. why would you say that if you don t think you deserved credit