Senator George Mitchell was president of the club and we had 288 members. They were all the rage. And the world war ii memorial dedicated, and Major League Baseball returned to washington as though washington nationals. For 15 years and David Rubenstein is back. David as we all know is cofounder and coexecutive chairman of the karloff group and chairman of the board. And the performing arts, a Strong Institution at the council on foreign relations. And engaged in many many other philanthropic activities. The patriotic philanthropy, generous financing, great historical landmarks, including the Washington Monument, the Lincoln Memorial. The us marine corps. And monticello, and the arlington house. And purchased rare copies of historic documents like the declaration of independence, the emancipation proclamation, and magna carta to ensure they are publicly displayed at the smithsonian and national archives. At the Economic Club, the insightful revealing and entertaining interview were, at
Essenceroberts said in that normally, courts will defer to a decision by an administrative agency, as long as it is reasonable. There is a wide latitude we will give you, but in this case, it really seems like the decision to include a question about ofizenship, the explanation the department of commerce gave was a pretext. They said they wanted the data of citizenship to better enforce federal Voting Rights laws and that the department of justice had requested it, but when you look at the evidence in the case, it looks like the department of commerce started talking about including the question on the census pretty much immediately after the inauguration and effectively went out shopping for someone who would ask it for the data, so that they would have a reason to use the question. That is a complex opinion. Other justices also wrote, concurring in part. Amy some of the justices would have deferred altogether to the agencys decision, just as Stephen Breyer would have not deferred to
Research and suggestions for improving the management of public lands. We take your calls and you can join the conversation on facebook and twitter. Next. Ton is host preparations are underway for President Trumps salute to america in washington tomorrow. One concern was the use of tanks brought in by flat head flatbed trucks and put on display during the event. You can watch that on cspan tomorrow starting at 5 00. This is the washington journal for july 3. The Inspector General released a report on overcrowded conditions of detainees along sections of the southern border. Using terms such as dangerous overcrowding and ticking time bomb. We will get your thoughts on the situation. Here is how you can call and let us know if you live in the eastern and central time zones, 2027488000. If you live in the mound and pacific time zones, 2027488001. If you are a border state resident at the southern border, 2027488002. You can post your thoughts on twitter at cspanwj and on our Facebook Page
Doctrine or keep it. Custice roberts well hear argument first this morning in case 221219, relentless versus the department commerce. Mr. Martinez. Or aument of Roman Martinez on behalf of the petitioners martinez mr. Chief justice, and may it please the court for too long, chevron has distorted the judicialss and undermined statutory interpretation. It should be overror three reasons. First, chevron violates the constitution. Article iii emwe judges to say what the law is. It requires them to interpret federal statutes using their best and iepdent judgment. Chevron undermines that duty. It reallocates ieretive authority from courts to agenciesanit forces courts to adopt inferior agency constructions that aued for political or policy reasons. In so, chevron blocks judges from serving as faithful agents of congress. It mandates judicial bias and enures agency overreach. And by removing key checks o executive power, it threatens individual liber. Chevron also violates the apa. The most s
Doctrine or keep it. Chief Justice Roberts we hear argument first this morning ase 221219, relentless versus the department of commerce. Mr. Martinez. Oral argument of roman marti on behalf of the petitioners martinez mr. Chief e, and may it please the court for too long, chevron has distorted the judicial process and undermined statutory interpretation it should be overruled for three ass. First, chevron violates the constitution article iii empowers judges to what the law is. It requires them to interpret federal ates using their best and independent judgment. Chevron undermines that duty. It reallocates interpretive auory from courts to to adopt inferior agencycourts constructions that are issued fotical or policy reasons. In doing so, chevron blocks judges from serving as faithful agents of cong it mandates judicial bias and encourages agency overreach. And by removing key checks on executive power, it threatens individual liberty. Chevron allates the apa. The most straightforward