A really interesting way when the democratic chairman Jerrold Nadler said 3 times repeating you did not exonerate trump and muller said yes to all 3 of those answers so in many ways hes challenging trying to narrative of what has actually happened and i think that thats something that the democrats will definitely use to continue to emphasize both from mischaracterize what the report said and also that the report does have a lot of really. Challenging evidence to show that there are many points where trump obstructed justice we now see the democrats are continuing to try to emphasize that to state it in plain language because very few people have actually read the report to try to pick out the most egregious examples of potential of struction to get muller to acknowledge them to to restate them in plain terms for a larger public as to whether that information well really galvanize people to continue some of these investigations or push to impeachment as Many Democrats want thats anothe
There are no cameras allowed in federal court. We have these sketches, where donald j trump, the 44th president of the united states, it was arraigned for eight 45th president of the united states, was arraigned on four Felony Counts for his attempts to steal the election. The ex president pleaded not guilty, there were no literal handcuffed. But he surrendered and was arrested, he submitted to federal custody in the Federal Courthouse. Special counsel jack smith sat in the front row during the arraignment. Defendant trump was sworn in. We did not hear a lot from him, but when asked by the Magistrate Judge, he stated his full name, quote, donald j trump, john. When asked his age he said 77, 77. He entered a plea of not guilty on all charges for his attempts to subvert American Democracy and and the Constitutional Republic as we know it. In an extraordinary and unexpected term, the Magistrate Judge warned the defendant, donald john trump, to not try to influence any jurors. She warned t
if he broke the law to stay in office in 2020. both of these cases, what was at stake was his own ego. now it s his own freedom. imagine, he has no incentive to be restrained by the law in any regard. because either he wins, and he assumes dictatorial powers, or killers and goes to prison. i ll add to mark that. to your point, it s important. the new york case is about crimes he committed pursuing being elected, that s alleged. these are crimes he committed to stay in power despite being unelected. the first impeachment was about official misconduct in pursuit of being elected, and the case brought by robert marlowe and which he angina it gave me prigozhin for and spirit to the floor of the usa, can spur criminal case against the there s a lot of election associated crimes. absolutely.
The Simpsons Revisits Marge s First Near-Affair With Jacques cbr.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from cbr.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.