One could argue that it never really disappeared, just diminished with the end of the cold war. How far can the current conflict over ukraine take it . And what does it mean for the rest of the world to discuss it, im now joined by what is id, professor of Political Communications at the university of tech, ron professors, that is great to talk to you. Thank you very much for your time. Thank you for hiring. Now, in one of your recent articles, you suggested that they said you political rivalry over your grade that the all i now observing in summer, even participating in just like the problem of iran. Suppose it malicious Nuclear Tension is essentially an artificial problem. It was deliberately created by the americans to justify their intentional jewel political. You cannot make hostility towards those countries. Does washington even need a pretext to do what it is that its mind on doing . You know, when it comes to russia, i think they do because its. Busy not very easy to question r
Find an excuse. And i think thats why they dont want the ukraine to finish, because if there is a settlement, then you are not going to be able to use ukraine to put pressure on russia. And that is why if you go back a few years ago, the United States did not want to miss agreements to go through because thats what that solve on the problems. And then ukraine would not have been able to be used as a stage to attack ratio. It will cost difficult, but the problem with that rationale is that the warning, the upgrade is putting pressure not only on russia, but pretty much the rest of the world. Because we see that in the form of skyrocketing within the field prices in many, many countries that have nothing to do with russia or ukraine on filling the pinch. Now youve been pretty open about your use that you believe that these conflicting ukraine is changing their current world order, and that is pushing it towards the more multi polar arrangement with different power theyre going to compete
Hiring. Now, in one of your recent articles, you suggested that they said you political rivalry over your credit, that the, all i now observing and some are even participating in just line that problem of iran. Suppose that malicious Nuclear Intentions is essentially an artificial problem. It was deliberately created by the americans to justify their intentional geopolitical. You cannot make hostility towards those countries. Does washington even need a pretext to do what it said . Its mind them doing, you know, when it comes to russia, i think they do because its. Busy not that easy to pressure russia when it comes to you. They can always threatened to take your case to the. Ready Un Security Council with russia having a veto power in the security cancer. Thats not going to work out that, you know, they choose the don trying to make it easier ball with russia. Russia has lots of Nuclear Bombs already, so that, that is not going to work with russia is. So if you like, the states wants
They can always threatened to take your case to the Un Security Council with russia having a veto power in the security cancer. Thats not going to work out that they actually are trying to make an easier ball with russia. Russia has a lot of Nuclear Bombs already, so that, that is not going to work with russia. Is so, if you like the states once to fight russia and they want to do that, as you said, they need to find an excuse. And i think that is why they dont want the ukraine to finish. Because if there is a settlement, then youre going to be able to use ukraine to put pressure on russia. And that is why if you go back a few years ago, the United States did not want to miss agreement to go through. Because thats without solve on the problems, and then ukraine would not have been able to be used as a stage to attract russia. It will cost difficult. But the problem with that rationale is that the warning your brain is putting pressure not only on russia, but pretty much the rest of the
A number of years. In fact, one could argue that it never really disappeared, just diminished with the end of the cold war current. Can the current conflict over ukraine . Take it and what does it mean for the rest of the world . To discuss it, im now joined by what is id, professor of Political Communications at the university of tech, ron professor. His id is great to talk to you. Thank you very much for your time. Thank you for having now. In one of your recent articles, he suggested that this is you political rivalry over your grand, that the, all on our observing and some are even participating in just like that problem off iran. Suppose it malicious Nuclear Intentions is essentially an artificial problem. Its, it was deliberately created by the americans to justify their intentional geopolitical. You cannot make hostility towards those countries. Does washington even need a pretext to do what it said . Its mind im doing, you know, when it comes to russia, i think they do because