In the Washington Post on how you will cast your ballot in november. If you are voting early, the number to call 202 7488000. If you are voting on election day, november 3, 202 7488001. If you are going to vote by mail, 202 7488002. And if you are not voting at all in the selection, 202 7488002 202 7488003. Join us on social media, on twitter cspanwj, facebook. Facebook span. Org showing thathere most americans want to vote before the november third election with a significant shift from previous years. About six out of 10 registered voters nationwide say they want to cast their ballots before election day. A significant shift that will force the candidates to reshape how they campaign in the final weeks of the election season. Fear of coronavirus and doubts about the reliability of mailin voting after months of attacks from President Trump weighing heavily on americans as they decide to safely how to safely make sure that their vote will be counted. Host House Homeland Security holdin
Personally bought insurance for themselves fearing they would be sued because of the, quote, madhouse going on behind the scenes of the fbi, the misconduct there. The flynn probe was such a problem, it was a, quote, nightmare at the fbu, that the agent running it, quote, was obsessed with conspiracy theories. That person thought to be Andrew Mccabe. And so flimsy was the case against flynn, that the fbi planned to shut it down earlier than realized, in november of 2016, the day trump won. But top fbi officials kept it alive to satisfy the Obama Administration. Plus, ken starr back with us on this revelation, a key fbi agent who worked on both the flynn case and the Mueller Probe said he believes the flynn probe was part of a, quote, push to get trump, that trumprussia collusion was not there, it was a dead end, that the flynn probe was so, quote, problematic and based on such dumb theory thats a quote that he even warned there would be an investigation into what the fbi would do, and h
Longtime republican strategist and msnbc political analyst and out with new book still right. Thank you for being with us. Its an honor to be with you. Thank you for having me. Whats the message in the book . I think i wrote it for two reasons and two different audiences. Lets say to left and right audience, i wrote it for the left because i often hear conservativism denigrated as a philosophy. And part of that is or a large part is a misunderstanding of what conservativism is. I want to create a rational defense of conservatism as a philosophy. Because progressivism as progressive forms of government is a rationing governing philosophy. My philosophy is conservatism. And i guess if i think about it, i wrote it for the right for the exact same reasons because i hear a lot of people pronouncing policies often repeated by the president and it gets labeled as conservatism. Trade is one of the most profound ones to look at. To me its like watching somebody tear into raw flesh and eat it an
Spending. Current funding levels expire on september 30. All of the senate live on cspan2. Joining us is rick tyler, now stillh a new book, right. What is the message in the book . I think i wrote it for two reasons, and to different audiences. Lets say its too left and right audiences. A large part of it is a misunderstanding of what conservatism is. A, i wanted to create rational defense of conservatism as write about conservatism an attractive governing philosophy. In the same way that other writers can and have written as about progressivism. Because progressivism and many countries have progressive forms of government are a rational form of philosophy. It is not mine. My philosophy is conservatism. I would like people, at a minimum, who take the progressive point of view, to understand what actual conservatism is. If i think about it, i wrote it for the right for the exact same reasons. I hear a lot of people pronouncing policies often repeated by the president and it gets labored
Two reasons and two different audiences. Lets say it is the left and right audience. I wrote for the left because i often hear conservatism denigrated as a philosophy. Part of that is a large part of it is a misunderstanding of what conservatism is. A, i wanted to create rational defense of conservatism as write about conservatism an attractive governing philosophy. In the same way that other writers can and have written as about progressivism. Because progressivism and many countries have progressive forms of government are a rational form of philosophy. It is not mine. My philosophy is conservatism. I would like people, at a minimum, who take the progressive point of view, to understand what actual conservatism is. If i think about it, i wrote it for the right for the exact same reasons. I hear a lot of people pronouncing policies often repeated by the president and it gets labored labeled as conservative. Will espouse philosophies that are not conservative. I think trade is one of t