And vivian lee not here the owners and the architects of the project that is no a speck development it is where they and theyre children live theyve minimum minsz missed the height to the code and received the full support of the recommendation the Planning Department and received unanimous approval from the Planning Commission on a 6 to zero vote commissioner wu was absent i noticed Katherine Moore clearly expressed her opinions you have her quotes in the brief the project will be 10 feet lower than the height and set back of 15 and a half feet and contain two additional set back of 8 and 15 feet on the second and third levels from the rear facade the permit holders sent in letters from the adjacent neighbors and ms. Murdock is a tenant of the adjacent building that has windows facing at about exterior courtyard she express those concerns indeed the discretionary review applicant not just happened to attend they visited the Apartment Building twice and the courtyard away was able to s
Good evening again commissioners greg on behalf of the permit holder in defines to the commissioners time and commissioner hondas schedule ill be brief and glad to answer questions should the commission have any this is a structural mraerntd that is adjacent to the appellants Property Line he has a relationship wall and concerned that the planter and the trees in it would cause lateral loading on the wall the permits holders family purchased this property in 2007 and those planters were constructed probably a decade to two decades prior to the purchase by the kc family the bit of a misnomer it says retrofit planters the plan to remove the planters and sing it to bedrock and support a newcele concrete planter with a bottom on top of the peers to make sure no loading is exerted on the retaining wall both dbi and the permit holder Civil Engineering consultants inspected the wall and found no major cracks or recent damage to the walls as port of the permit process research was done and stu
Good evening again commissioners greg on behalf of the permit holder in defines to the commissioners time and commissioner hondas schedule ill be brief and glad to answer questions should the commission have any this is a structural mraerntd that is adjacent to the appellants Property Line he has a relationship wall and concerned that the planter and the trees in it would cause lateral loading on the wall the permits holders family purchased this property in 2007 and those planters were constructed probably a decade to two decades prior to the purchase by the kc family the bit of a misnomer it says retrofit planters the plan to remove the planters and sing it to bedrock and support a newcele concrete planter with a bottom on top of the peers to make sure no loading is exerted on the retaining wall both dbi and the permit holder Civil Engineering consultants inspected the wall and found no major cracks or recent damage to the walls as port of the permit process research was done and stu
Draft finding commissioner president lazarus commissioner honda. And commissioner wilson thank you. The vote is 4 to zero the finding are adapted and the 10 day rehearing request period is now closed. Well return to item 7 which has been called appeal i believe is there anyone on behalf of the appellant . Okay. Seeing none then well hear from the permit holder good evening again commissioners greg on behalf of the permit holder in defines to the commissioners time and commissioner hondas schedule ill be brief and glad to answer questions should the commission have any this is a structural mraerntd that is adjacent to the appellants Property Line he has a relationship wall and concerned that the planter and the trees in it would cause lateral loading on the wall the permits holders family purchased this property in 2007 and those planters were constructed probably a decade to two decades prior to the purchase by the kc family the bit of a misnomer it says retrofit planters the plan to r
Good evening again commissioners greg on behalf of the permit holder in defines to the commissioners time and commissioner hondas schedule ill be brief and glad to answer questions should the commission have any this is a structural mraerntd that is adjacent to the appellants Property Line he has a relationship wall and concerned that the planter and the trees in it would cause lateral loading on the wall the permits holders family purchased this property in 2007 and those planters were constructed probably a decade to two decades prior to the purchase by the kc family the bit of a misnomer it says retrofit planters the plan to remove the planters and sing it to bedrock and support a newcele concrete planter with a bottom on top of the peers to make sure no loading is exerted on the retaining wall both dbi and the permit holder Civil Engineering consultants inspected the wall and found no major cracks or recent damage to the walls as port of the permit process research was done and stu