3 to 5 for certain conditions because if i hear the gentleman kreshlg who are indeed hands on practitioners i have to believe that the time is to short that i i want to open the discussion about aging in place as a way to look at affordability and preferences for that. Commissioner wu. So following up on the earlier information on the packet. I think its important and i assume ultimate rent board will give the tenant who have been ellis effected all the information about the housing thats one hundred percent affordable like bridging and housing and go to every single person. I think thats the kind of housing thats going to serve the ellis active people because their income is lower. I want to make a motion as recommend by commissioner wu for this legislation second and i want a clarification of the 3 year review if thats y what youre saying. Yeah. I would have preferred the short period of time but its been four or five years its be its been taken care of. 3 makes sense to me. Im suppo
Proceedings if you care too do staurd. Item feigning has already continued for item 16 at 238 eureka street. Dr. Requester. You have before a erect district Street Project thats proposed for constructed for a vertical condition to address addition the vertical addition would add two feet additional feet to the height of the building and the rear edition would be multiple steroid and add about this or that. 5 poet to the building overall depth and it will include revolver decks it be to be a singlefamily residence. The dr requesters for the architecture context to the neighborhood and it would impact their foundation the water system. The petition is signed by 21 neighbors who live within a 2 hundred block of eureka street and are opted because of the building scale. 7 neighbors within this same a block have sent letters in support. And the parties involved have been 20 to communities boards but have not been able to get resolve. Theres are nearly 12 ideal structures and the Department
Dr. calling names . If your name has been called feel free to approach the podium. Im tamara im phils one of but my speaking for tor i didnt downstairs who lives at the 254 eureka street. This statement is to request the Planning Department not to allow the expansion as currently proposed but to require the owner Richard Brown to consultant with his neighbors with a plan that has the approval of the immediate neighbors. Indian it the Planning Department as required the owner of 238 eureka to mitigate the extension to the front of the house. Peroxide the attic extension is only visual from the street thus keeping the integrity of the vieshlt. But my understanding which the drawings has significant impacts of the rear building to the neighborhood. Its extended to 10 feet of stairs and the second floor is 24 feet and its third floor again extends further. It reduces the neighborhoods light and impacts on the overall integrity of the back home where it intrudes into a park like spates and
Makes sense requests. I do recognize that any neighborhood changes over time but i hope the city mgdz the changes to make sure the changes are characteristic of the neighborhood thank you. Next speaker, please. My name is james frost i will u i live on eureka street i 3ru6r7d there in 1984 i raised two son and the oldest teaches and this you young one is a partner with me in a smoking gun in San Francisco. Im very invested in this city. And im acquit concerned with the direction our cities going with the Housing Stock for for a fact for folks like my son. Ive worked here since 1975 and witnessed many changes over the years. Im not opposed to change. Many of my neighborhood including myself have modified our homes. I built a one story edition and didnt build a second because of my neighbors. Im opposed to the proposed project as it now stand for two reasons. First and foremost i believe this project will change 238 from a house that blends with the prominent size of the rest of the home