Percent, but i would say that, it seems to be and most of the work and you would imagine that the work is going to take place foundation, and sheer walls, and you know, the labor insensitive but i dont think that they are totally touching 100 percent of the building to do the work just the certain areas. But it is all wood framed. And the amount of work that is anticipated there is quite extensive and it is probably more Cost Effective for them to do this and to ignore the existing electrical and plumbing and come back and put it back in. Just working around it. And i didnt hear anything from the permit holder of how they are going to schedule the work and how they were going to do that and what you know what impact that was and that would be be a good question. Mr. Duffy, the permit that is before us, does that contemplate the soft story work and all of this other . Or this is just a partial . No, they want to add some of the soft story work to this permit, and i believe that is what
And we dont have anything further to add. I have a question. My understanding is that your issues are really more about the tenantcies than they are about the work that is being done, in that the how is the work going to impact their current tenant and their future and their right to return . In essence, yes, but there is a concern about the scope of the work because it seems to be a changing target, they have now added in the plumbing and electrical, yesterday, for the first time. Today, for the first time, there is this statement that the tenants all need to move so that they can conduct the electrical, so, what is exactly the scope of the work . But really it relate to how long the tenants feel they are going to be displaced . Is that not the case. It all goes back to the tenants yes. Thank you. Thank you, commissioners. I think that there are a few discreet issues that need to be cleared up. Firstly, i think that it is important to note that this is a new owner of the building and
Work and you would imagine that the work is going to take place foundation, and sheer walls, and you know, the labor insensitive but i dont think that they are totally touching 100 percent of the building to do the work just the certain areas. But it is all wood framed. And the amount of work that is anticipated there is quite extensive and it is probably more Cost Effective for them to do this and to ignore the existing electrical and plumbing and come back and put it back in. Just working around it. And i didnt hear anything from the permit holder of how they are going to schedule the work and how they were going to do that and what you know what impact that was and that would be be a good question. Mr. Duffy, the permit that is before us, does that contemplate the soft story work and all of this other . Or this is just a partial . No, they want to add some of the soft story work to this permit, and i believe that is what he mentioned pulling in some ply woods and that is not part of
Besides the ones that are in we this evening, what does the permit history look like on that property . I looked at the permit history, there were permits revoked on the board of appeals, for the fire escape issues, and i did for the really look into it, but there were permits revoke and what i saw on the visits there probably was not as many permits taken out as there should have been, the building is in bad maintenance and it looks like it need, it is not a building that you walk past and say that it looks great. It need work done to it. There is another permit that is issued for replacing the floor joists in kitchen and so i dont know you will leave through that. And so that would be a reason but that permit is not appealed. But it was issued earlier this year as a revision to this permit that is suspended. I think that this is the 6th time this site has been in front of us. Yeah, i dont know what the issues were, but i saw that the permits were revoked. Thank you. Corey tee for the
Welcome back, we are going to go to 9 a. November, 13109. Mariposa utah neighborhood association, appellant s vs. Planning commission, respondent 480 potrero avenue. Protesting the issuance on august 08, 2013, to Reza Khoshnevisan sia consulting corp. , sec. 329 adoption of findings large project authorization to allow construction of new sixstory, 58foot Tall Building with up to 75 dwelling units, approx. 970sf of retail, and up to 47 offstreet Parking Spaces . Case no. 2011. 0430xe. Motion no. 18945. For hearing today. This has to do with a planning motion, 198945 and i believe that before we begin, we have to hear from two commissioners. Commissioners, i am recusing myself on the advice from the City Attorney for a conflict of interest, financial. You are asking us . Yes. We need to do it one at a time . No, there is no motion needed, this is a conflict under the code. And so. Yeah. And okay, and i am declaring a conflict as well. Okay. Thank you. Okay. And i am extremely tired, but