but still an issue. bill: he made a reverse course in the past week about suggesting the name was not good or appropriate. what was behind that? basically the inflation reduction act was not intended to reduce inflation. it was intended to get money toward the climate change agenda. he was talking about it s more about an alternative for growth, he is thinking growth is in solar, growth is in wind. all of the climate change components. and so he is right. republican said that from the beginning it won t reduce inflation. it didn t. that s not is what reducing inflation. the federal reserve has raised interest rates 11 times and it s slowing the economy and it s taking inflation down. that s what is happening with inflation. the problem that the federal reserve has is as it is trying to rein in inflation it is up against the tsunami of more spending. the president still wants more stimulus out there trying to
The lawsuit alleges that the school district violated First Amendment rights when it removed the book, which tells the story of two male penguins who raised a penguin chick at New York’s Central Park Zoo.
debate off the table. it s put forth charges across the western united states and the results of these decisions can be seen by anyone who walks down the street in any of our cities and from san francisco to phoenix right now, both of those cities are under federal court injunctions preventing them from addressing this problem. that s what s cruel and unusual. i remember we had a conversation, the two of us, after boise. you wanted the supreme court to take the boise case and it didn t. do you think the court is going to take this matter now given this ruling? if so, which way do you think it goes? we certainly hope that the court will. we had hoped the circuit would take up the case again in reverse course, but it refused to do so. now there are millions of people
doing anything to address this problem. that s what s cruel and unusual. this is a tragedy and these decisions are hurting the very people they were meant to protect. i remember we had a conversation, the two of us, after boise. you wanted the supreme court to take the boise case and it didn t. do you think the court is going to take this matter now given this ruling? if so, which way do you think it goes? we certainly hope that the court will. we had hoped that the ninth circuit would take up the case in reverse course, but it refused to do so. now there are millions of people across the entire western united states who are looking to the supreme court to untie the hands of our local governments and to allow us to take action. i hope that people s eyes did not glaze over during the setup, but i thought it was important to try to set the stage. what s the takeaway?
Only 35% of Russian citizens would reverse Russian dictator Vladimir Putin’s decision to launch a full-scale invasion of Ukraine, according to the results of a new survey conducted by the Russian Field sociological company on June 16-19.