thought, that for some it will always be 2020. i m thinking of specific people, lawrence. i need a minute with that. one person in particular. i think if he could only just hold all of the aging process is to 2020, that would be pretty great for all of us, not just him. i d like him to do it for all of us. science, science, science. thank you alice. have a great show. after never reaching unanimous agreement on who should be their speaker of the house, house republicans are now unanimous about two things. first, house republicans unanimously voted for a bill to defund the police. that s right. the very first thing house republicans voted on was de-funding the police. the police they want to funder the federal tax police. house republicans voted unanimously to defund the internal revenue service in a way that would specifically target the capacity of the internal revenue service to investigate tax returns of the very richest people in america. republicans voted
word with lawrence $1 o donnell. good evening dar lawrence. i have katie porter. she has a big announcement she made today. she has a big announcement. i m kind of thrown because of the profundity of that last thought, that for some it will always be 2020. i m thinking of specific people, lawrence. i need a minute with that. one person in particular. i think if he could only just hold all of the aging process is to 2020, that would be pretty great for all of us, not just him. i d like him to do it for all of us. science, science, science. thank you alice. have a great show. after never reaching unanimous agreement on who should be their speaker of the house, house republicans are now unanimous about two things. first, house republicans unanimously voted for a bill to defund the police. that s right. the very first thing house republicans voted on was de-funding the police. the police they want to funder the federal tax police. house republicans voted unanimo
that had zero revenue and expenses. that shows criminal intent. he also had a couple schedule sees where the revenue and the expenses matched the dollar and a number of retired irs officer said the never seen that in their entire careers. i think there s a very easy case. jurors would understand that alvin bragg could bring, personally, against on trump, based on these schedule sees, which also apply to his state tax return. tim o brien, now that we have seen the trump tax returns, thanks to house ways and means chairman richard neil, democratic chairman until the republicans just took over. those tax returns reveal that i pay more taxes the donald trump. those tax returns also reveal that if your high school kid with a part-time job, you pay more taxes the donald trump in
called a schedule c in which he had no revenue and took over $600,000 an expensive s. the state of new york in city of new york auditors disallowed up. trump demanded a trial. in both cases he lost. the judges said that s civil fraud, not criminal, but civil. his own lawyer testified against him and essentially accused him of being a forger. once judges have said that, you are on notice. and yet as candidate and president donald trump filed 26 more of these schedule sees that had zero revenue and expenses. that shows criminal intent. he also had a couple schedule sees where the revenue and the expenses matched the dollar and a number of retired irs officer said the never seen that in their entire careers. i think there s a very easy
comment because of transexempt confidentiality agreements. the democrats on the hill, i would have to believe, at some point, are going to start aggressively trying to distance themselves from lois lerner and the clowns who were running the irs right now. i don t know that any democrats were are rushing to embrace the irs or lois lerner in particular. if you listen to some of the testimony from democrats during these hearings, they have been pretty hard on her and for good political reason too. i mean, the irs is not exactly the kind of agency that any politician wants to wrap their metaphor cal arms around. i think that this issue is there is going to be a drip, drip, drip, as more of these e-mails are scrutinized there are more instances like that