Where they lost anywhere from 50 to 100 Million People. Probably end of the Second World War all the soldiers were sick. That was a terrible situation. Wars over, man, dropped the big one. What . Over . Did you say over . Nothing is over until we decide it is what sit over when the germans bombed pearl harbor . Hell no . Germans . Forget it. I tell you what, he probably would be doing a better job right now than the current occupant of the white house. Mika, you know, this is there are just not words so sad. First of all, he hasnt yet figured out the year for the worst pandemic in modern world history. He says it wrong all the time. I dont know if he doesnt have any Staff Members that can come up and tell him that it was 1918 and 1919, sir, since he likes people to say sir. This reminds me of Joseph Stalin who nobody on his staff had the courage to tell him, after they had gone into the netherlands, he said lets invade holland next. Nobody had the courage to tell stalin. Obviously nobo
They are written for scientists or technologists or experts in whatever the field is whether its mechanics or fluid dynamics or bio chemistry. And the Patent Office actually encourages you not to put too much background science into your patent, but its all deemed to be there. So, when a generalist judge gets one of these patent cases, they have to figure out what the patent means in order for them to figure out whether the patent is a valid claim of an invention and whether the defendants invention infringes the patent. And often thanks to a ruling the Supreme Court handed down close to 20 years ago called markman, they have whats called a markman hear chg is basically a little mini trial before the court, not a jury, where they decide what the terms in the patent mean. Often you have experts testify. Now, usually in federal court when you have experts come in and testify and the judge decides which expert he believes and which expert he doesnt, that is reviewed very deferential on ap
Fdrs first new deal the nra was unconstitutional because it delegated in the case of carter cole to a consortium of private entities, the coal miners Coal Company Officials and private citizens the power to set terms of competition and set wages and set working conditions, et cetera, essentially a delegated governmental functions to a private entity and that violated the constitution. That was one of the real major flash points of the new deal controversial between fdr and the Supreme Court back in the 1930s and since then there hadnt been another case holding that delegation was constitutional, but we have one now and its on the docket and, you know, ive given you a feel, i think, for what the challengers have said and will say in the Supreme Court. Ill give you a little bit of a feel for how were defending that statute. Were trying to defend this by narrowing the scope of the issue really in saying, look, the reality here is that it isnt right to think about this statute as a delegat
Framework that we have utilized for this analysis and supervisor mar touched on it in his opening comments. We know that Food Security and Healthy Eating are really complex policy issues and you cannot just look at the issue from one dimension. And we search for a way to communicate this better and understand it better but we found it from the World Health Organization to be helpful for us and we have modified that. And so it has allowed us to accurately examine the issue. Food resource and access and consumption, the ability to have the resources to purpose the food. And this can come from your income oracle fresh or wic and other programs. Access to nutritionally appropriate food convenient to you and either through the food retaylor the food meal programs. And then, the Food Consumption really refers to the ability to prepare healthy meals and then the knowledge basic of the nutrition and food safety and cooking and so this is where, the whole area around cooking nutritional educati
With those Communications Still be regarded regarded as external because it is to an sir overseas or is an internal because the only person with access to them is myself and i live in the uk . Gimmick of the sir is overseas it is regarded as external with the save regards as said email sent to someone overseas if i am somebody from the point of view of National Security would i have the same assurance of security for something i have uploaded to the cloud externally but then the modification kick did before you examined it as if i had uploaded to raise sir in the uk using the other form so with the two types of warrants which should take that douceur type to the path of modification it is as strong . Yes. Effectively yes it looks very similar the same considerations with the secretary of the state. Can i improve this area of discussion . It is very complex and as has been noted there is some public concern as to the perception of the Different Levels of safeguard is there not a case wi