Investigated the incident. This is two hours. The House Committee on Homeland Security subcommittee on oversight and Management Efficiency in the Governmental Affairs on subcommittee on Regulatory Affairs and federal management will come to order. The purpose of this hearing is to examine failures at the u. S. Secret service and their implications governmentwide. The chair recognizes himself for an opening statement. In september, the the dhs office of Inspector General of the oig released a report on its four month long investigation into improper access and distribution of information within the secret service. The findings were alarming. Widespread violation of the privacy act and Agency Policy occurred by secret Service Employees who access and distributed information on a number of congress past Employment Application and Senior Management did nothing immediately to stop it. Inspector general john roth stated the episode was deeply disturbing. In addition, director clancy announce
Country. Guest i agree. Look at thesting to different outcomes. The decisions were pro defendant. And, of the search and seizure berger and william rehnquist, they favor the libertyt the cost of , personal and individual. Host we have more cases and we produced a book that is available to you and outlines the cases. It is available on the website. Theng the next few months, this series will reair and you can watch this on television. This will archive on the website. Will hitilable and we it to you quickly. We have a few minutes left. We will take a few calls. Next is pete. Thank you for this. I enjoy this and try to catch it whenever. About the Fourth Amendment jurisprudence and the exclusionary rule being considered with a lot of exceptions. What do you think about the warrant preference Going Forward . There is that tension in the Fourth Amendment with a preference for the warrant and a ness requirement. Guest you see a orange reference construction warrant preference construction.
Down to the plains from the top of the mountain inspired the poetry and inspired the images that are captured in that poetry of the United States. Watch all of our events from Colorado Springs throughout the andon cspan 2s book tv, sunday on American History tv on cspan 3. Formeror agricultural secretary dan glickman discusses Food Security. Topics include past agriculture issues and the types of action that could be taken in future to improve food supply, access, and sanitation. From the Johns Hopkins school of advanced international studies, this is a little more than an hour. Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Im bob thompson, visiting scholar here working to develop a problem in agriculture and a program in agriculture and Food Security. Teaching a couple courses in that area. Im delighted that in continuing our seminar in International Agriculture topics that today we have former secretary of agriculture dan glickman here to talk about Food Security and government dysfunction. Ca
Way. Whereas the house of representatives may have about 40 or 50 members that are predominantly Food Production represents Food Production districts. Every United States senator represents at least some Food Production. That includes from the smallest states of rhode island and delaware to, of course, the largest states. And historically, those interests were dominated from people by the midwest and the heartland states. So illinois, indiana, missouri, my own state of kansas. And the midwest, up through the dakotas. And states in the south where you had members of congress and especially members of the United States who were elected forever. They accumulated great amounts of power, and they were able to influence the political process rather significantly so the states of mississippi, which was one state that had accumulated a large amount of power over the years. But all of the southern states, georgia, south carolina, north carolina, called the southern crops had very, very powerful
The final death sentence for those groups in those areas. Those groups tend to overplay their hand. They have to be careful. They have to be very careful about how to act. I do not to mention the role of and reining in those groups, maybe not militarily but he still very influential. You dont want to cause trouble and you dont want to be direct enemy every day because in iraqi will come out on top. Its very difficult. And, finally, i dont think there will be a hezbollah anymore. Ive heard different metaphors about what will happen at right. Somebody told it would be like libya with different groups competing. I dont think it will be that. Theres a safe structure that those groups out to be part of protecting. It cannot be like hezbollah for simple reason, its different kind of threat and different groups. Hezbollah was only dominant group in lebanon during the lebanese civil war. In iraq of all of these groups. You have 150, eight of them are really big. We have to wonder which one wil