in february that massa had reportedly groped male staffers. pelosi s staff was told even earlier about different concerns, and we don t know what the procedure is for informing the speaker when something like that comes to her office. as you ve heard, she referred to the earlier allegations as rumors but of course, when the house eitherigs committee found that charlie rangel should have known that his staff was aware of those corporate-funded trips to the carribean that he took, you could ask should pelosi have known, that her staff knew about this, jon ment jon: what s with the ethics committee of massa, i thought that was over now. right, there have been reports that it s over, of course, the member himself, eric massa, no longer a member of the house. there s a report this morning the investigation is closed you, but fox has not confirmed that yet, and there are members who want it to stay open so that just these kinds of questions with be answered about who knew what, and when th
stossel is here. she had a perfume allergy and no one can wear deodorant, is that fair or does it stink? in kelly s court, top of the hour. jon: russian history causing a modern day controversy in moscow, at issue, plans to put up billboards honoring soviet dictator joseph stalin for the may day parade that celebrates russia s world war ii victory over germany, the billboards have not been finalized but can you imagine seeing something like this in modern moscow? dana lewis is covering the story from us, streaming live from moscow. dana. reporter: jon, a lot of people cannot imagine it in russia here. russians have spent about 60 years trying to forget joseph stalin for what he did to them, to what he did to this country, and suddenly some officials here in the city government and maybe the kremlin, too, want to try and remember joseph stalin and people are trying to figure out why. the leader of the soviet union for 30 years until his death in 1953 is said by
despite being imprisoned he appears to be making major progress. this could be a major threat. we have more on some of the attacks that have already been associated with him and the story in general, foxnews.com. jon: diane, janice, mike, that s our news whip, thank you. jane: we want to get to our climate desk where harris is watching breaking news out of dallas. we re trying to confirm, potentially there would be three children inside this home, we re hoping that s not the case, but dallas police officers have shown up there, first they ve called for a chopper, they walled that offo called that off after the ground units got there and i ve talked to tim grawn at the assignment desk to figure out the course of action. there s a pretty they havey heavy swat presence. not a lot of information on the ground, they usually wait to tell us what happens. the voice is kdfw, their chopper had to pull away to refuel. you saw from the shots, the chopper knew enough to stay back. we don t w
what can you do, and i think that that s a fair question, and people will start to say you can t goch, what are you doing, you can t deliver, you can t blame it on the republicans, because you know, you weren t able to you have enough people that you should be able to do this on your own, and i think that s the other part of the argument. jon: kate, how do republicans respond? well, i think they respond by saying it s not all or nothing. obviously this is an ideological drive by obama and pelosi and reid to get through the whole thing, basically cradle to grave government involvement in your life. there are many items that aachieve bipartisan agreement almost immediately, buying insurance across state lines, the democrats don t have to go home empty-handed in the fall. they could go home with very reasonable suggestions. but the white house is trying to turn public opinion and it s not turning at all. they re trying to suggest that somehow individuals will have more control over th
judge. when the judge sentenced him to that length of time he wasn t following the law. in california the department of corrections imlarchly, not in the side of the prosecution or the defense, has to correct mistakes in law. and that s what happened. it s a mistake by the judge and d.a. s office. jon: wendy, go ahead. eric, here s the problem. even if you re right, if it was just an error, what kind of legal system says it s an error to give a guy who rapes and molests three children repeatedly, it s an error to give him 28 years? and therefore, we shouldn t be worried that he was only getting three all these years later? look, let me also say something. i didn t say it was an error about the length of time. whatever the error was, it s absurd to say that it s an error! i don t care whose error it was, it s not an error to want to give a guy like that 28 years, if not longer. and you don t mention, also jon: which is why i said he should apologize. i ll tell you who should