Now on bbc news, or if any of the other parties, its wednesday in parliament the smaller parties fancy a go, does he agree that western policy towards iran they can table the motion is unfortunately basically failing . And we will give you failing to stop the activities the time for a vote. We saw, failing to stop i think the people of this country renuclearization, failing to stop hostagetaking, which has. A ladder for iran to climb down have had enough of it. This Parliament Must either stand aside and let this so we can get out of this entirely government get brexit done, or bring a vote of confidence and finally face the day dangerous situation. Of reckoning with the voters and i commend this 2a hours after the Supreme Court ruled that permanent suspension was unlawful, mps were back at work statement to the house. And giving their own verdict. I agree with the basic ingredients my right honourable friend has set out. The labour leader declined to take it is no disrespect to the ju
Study the view about whether they wish to table amendments to a bill whose basic subject matter was wellknown to them, they would be able to do that probably at least closely to his own level of acceptability. His own standard. The second point is it is is here that the bill today and there are several precedents. Those bills are ordinarily been government bills and very often concerning Northern Ireland. It is unusual, except, what is isnt is disorderly. The honorable gentleman raised important questions about money resolution and the queens consent. Yes, this bill is different but i have of course consulted the clerk of legislation and other senior clerks on whose procedural expertise we regularly call. My ruling on wednesday the third of april, 2019 in respect to the earlier bill which the honorable atleman referenced was column131 that the European Union does not require a ways and means motion or a money resolution. Extending the theory under article 50 would continue the uks righ
Start thattay at the every Single Member of this house whatever view they hold on the fundamental physical question before us, is trying as they see best, to act in the National Interest and the interest of their constituents. The problem, the reason we are here today, is of course that each of us has a slightly different view of what those best interests are. So i hope that we can debate this bill in what is a, i recognize, a very short amount of time. If im a response to the point i can do no better than to quote the right honorable member for west dorsett who on the third of april in the house said, it could only be done at high speed. Because there is no time left. I think wherever we stand on this issue, we know there is very little time left. Following the decision on promulgation, there is even less time that would have been available previously. Therefore i hope that we will stronglyh other with held views with respect and consideration during this debate. The focus of the bill
Scientists say this summers melting has been one of the most severe on record, leading to a global rise in sea levels. Thats all, stay with bbc world news. Now on bbc news, tuesday in parliament. Hello there and welcome to tuesday in parliament, where mps returned from their summer break and Boris Johnson is defeated in the commons as mps back moves to take over the agenda and try to stop a no deal brexit at the end of october. The ayes to the right, 328, the noes to the left, 301. The result comes as borisjohnson the left, 301. The result comes as Boris Johnson rejects the left, 301. The result comes as borisjohnson rejects the idea of asking for an extension to the brexit deadline. To force us to beg for yet another pointless delay. Eu leaders report that the government has so far failed to present any new proposal. And a conservative mp crosses the floor, leaving the Prime Minister with no working majority. Meanwhile, the minister in charge of no deal planning says no one can be bla
Relations between the countries. Called a new deal brexit. This portion of the debate is an hour and 45 minutes. Thank you very much. Readnk the move to be now a second time. I want to say at the start that every Single Member of this house, whatever view they hold , thee fundamental question they act inrying as the National Interest of their constituents. The problem, the reason why we are here is because each of us has a slightly different view of what those best interests are. Can debate this in a short amount of time. I can do no better than to quote a member who, on the third of april, said it can only be done at high speed because there is no time left. I think wherever we stand on this issue, we know there is little time left and following the decision, there is even less time that would have been available previously. Therefore, i hope we will treat each other, recognizing we have strongly held views with respect and consideration during this debate. The purpose of the bill is