only 35% say yes to that question. we ll turn it back over to the hearing but quickly, kelly, what more can you tell us about the fact that you have some democrats who requested the person behind this video also face questions at the hearing today. as i understand it there was no response from the chairman. reporter: the chairman is saying that there are other cases of litigation that were involved in that. i don t know all the answers behind it but cecile richards pointed out that she s here voluntarily. while there is a lot of emotion in this hearing, there isn t the kind of anger that you would expect toward a key witness that we see in some other kinds of hearings. so there is a level of respect that cecile richards is here in person. their group, planned parenthood, is providing documents. she s getting praise for being cooperative with congress, even amid these certainly strong lines of disagreement. i can tell you i think the chairman has said she was very cooperative but th
regardless of where she lives, her income, immigration status, whether she is insured, can get access to health care. that s what we do at planned parenthood and we re proud to do it. that s called respect. thank you, miss richards, for being here. thank the gentleman. now recognize the gent lgentlemm tennessee. this is my 22nd year in congress, i can assure you i ve seen many males treated worst than you ve been treated today. i can assure you i m not going to be tough on you but sure will you you don t expect us to be easier on you because you are a woman. absolutely not. that s not how my mama raised me. you say in your testimony that a lot of women wouldn t have access to certain types of health care were it not for planned parenthood. do you know that the department of health & human services says there are 9,727 health care service delivery sites, there
what you really want to know is what your effective tax rate is, whether it goes up or whether it goes down. yes with be these rates look like they re going to go very low. but if you lose all your deductions, it could not come out in the wash the way you want it to. i agree there are a lot of details to be learned on the plan. but this was a big part of this announcement yesterday, was that finally we would hear some details from trump about a policy. when you talk to him about syria, for example, he kind of says let them fight it out, then we pick up the remnants if you want to consider that a specific policy on this. but this is pretty fair. look, let s give him his due. i mean this is a reasonable tax plan. this is about as much detail as you get when someone s running for president. we know that it s very clear that if donald trump gets the nomination and is elected president, he is going to take bold steps to make sure that we no longer have the highest corporate tax rate or
romney did in 2012. we can compare it to what george bush i m sorry, jeb bush proposed a few weeks ago. this plan is much more generous and very unlikely to be revenue neutral. when trump says that people are wrong, that they would be bringing in at least $2.5 trillion in money that s stuck outside of this country, does that make any sense to you? i m afraid it doesn t, because when you do the math, when you bring in that $2.5 trillion, for example, the most that would raise would be $250 billion, which is a lot of money, of course. however, mr. trump has other aspects of his plans which are extremely generous. for example, he would reduce the corporate rate from 35% to 15%. when you do that, just in one year, that would more than offset the extra revenue that he would get from that repatriation provision. so, yes, we could get money from the component that he s
business people is even higher than the rate corporations pay. so we definitely need to bring these rates down if we re going to be competitive internationally. matt, the tax foundation which advocates lower tax rates says that the cost of trump s cuts could easily total more than $7 trillion over the next decade. depends on what happens to the deductions. i m glad matt brought up question of the deductions. we aren t flying blind here. ever since bowles and simpson made the big push for tax reform in 2010, we ve been studying all different types of tax plans. we have a pretty good idea of what are the possibilities on deductions. mr. trump has taken the chair ability deduction and the mortgage interest deduction off of the table. so there really are not once you take those off the table, there really aren t a lot of deductions and tax breaks left to make up the difference. in fact, even for the romney plan which was much less generous, it was very, very