Could get the groups together, of people from the community, and come to this location, to do our or to participate in the continue of assessing, if we dont have the facility to do it there, then people have to go to san jose or some other location to do it. So, the other and another just point that we provided to the budget analyst is that we have additional computers to use because we got them from the virtual warehouse from Child Support services. But we dont have a place to set them up right now with the Additional Space. And so i would be very happy to if we had a specific, you know, what the specific questions are, and we want to answer them and i was not aware until yesterday that there were any unanswered question or a belief of an unanswered question, we think that this makes economic sense and good policy sense and so we would ask for your assistance in this. So, one last question, if we were going to be able, and they were going to approve Additional Space for testing, at th
Point out that the first year rent of 257,400 for the first floor, is an increase of 134,827 or 110 percent, that is compared to the current of 122,523 on the second floor where it is now. This increase is due to a 47 percent increase in the rent per square foot as shown in table two and that is on page 74 of our report. And based on fair market value and an increase of 33,320 square feet that is a 43 increase in square footage. On page 75, of our report, we state that while dhr is showing that the increased floor space would allow more testing capacity, dhr does not have specific information on, current delays and testing and Service Eligibility lists due to insufficient space on the second floor or have test and generation of Civil Service list will be increased due to the increase space on the third floor. In fact, we request of the department and we were very desirous of recommending approval of this item and we requested the department to provide us with the documentation which we
Have to rent the hotel space to do testing. The other exams there are two exams in each department where in the Current Space does not accommodate our needs, but moving down to the first floor would. So we anticipate immediately, 30,000 a year of not spending on hotels, because we dont need those testing rooms. Thank you. Yes, supervisor, avalos, to the chair, for the budget analyst office. I do want to say that the department and the Human Resource and mr. Updike had lengthy conversations with me and so it was not like there was not a lot of discussion. I think that the two concerns and one is this 30,000 in hotel space, the final email i got was that there would be no savings in terms of that 30,000 a year. And there was an email after the one that was just referenced and i just think that would have made a difference if we felt there were some other cost savings that would have been incurred by the space. I think that the other things is that a number and i know that a lot of the di
Easton is really important to me as well. And so i am not prepared to forward this today as well. Given the number of questions that i still have as well. Okay. Thank you, supervisor mar. And again from my perspective, i agree with all of the concerns, i am sensitive too, i have too many comments from constituents all of the time about the buses breaking down and it happens on a routine basis and it effects us in the papers and all over the city and i would rather see us try to get this resolved in six days. Just a question on the prop j, is that something that if we were to move to the full board, whether that would be enough time to kind of determine whether that should be triggered or not . To the chair, to the committee members, it really depends on the complexity and the type of work that is being proposed. This generally two ways to contract for services, and one is through the prop j process when it is clear that City Employees have been performing a certain work and is being pr
Prop j is really important to me. And i realize that threemonth delay for accessing parts, and critical equipment is really unacceptable. And im very sensitive to the mtas needs, but i feel like the loss of potential jobs and whether the work is going to be transferred in a fair way and whether there is that kind of controls built into the contract as mentioned by mr. Easton is really important to me as well. And so i am not prepared to forward this today as well. Given the number of questions that i still have as well. Okay. Thank you, supervisor mar. And again from my perspective, i agree with all of the concerns, i am sensitive too, i have too many comments from constituents all of the time about the buses breaking down and it happens on a routine basis and it effects us in the papers and all over the city and i would rather see us try to get this resolved in six days. Just a question on the prop j, is that something that if we were to move to the full board, whether that would be e