you decide that the people in charge are responsible for my monetary discomfort this morning, then, yeah, they vote in the other direction and that is what it comes down to in georgia and other states as well. and gloria, i want to talk about the momentum shift. republicans are confident about their chances and taking one majority in the congress. i want to play two takes from two democrats. one an lekked democrat and another a democrat strategist. listen to this. we re bucking what are usual trends because folks know at the end of the day, do they want to go back to the sort of donald trump politics that divided our nation, i think that is a tough election season. it is a midterm election. but i still see a pathway for us to maintain control of the senate. with did not listen to voters in this election. and i think we re going to have a bad night because when voters tell you over and over and over again that they care mostly
kids died in their classrooms. laying there in piles of blood, ore students covering themselves with blood so they wouldn t get the shot themselves. so so it s a good thing that it happened. it s a damn shame it s taken so much bloodshed to get to this moment. maybe it s a bit of a shift in gun politics if you look at the 14 senators, only two are on the ballot. so he s going to be relekked to the senate. lisa murkowski still has her primary. donald trump supports her. you have one primary test thof issue. the wager behind this legislation on the part of gun control advocates at least in
reasons. first is the fact that democrats have such a slim majority in the house of representatives that really just one or two people could sway the direction of any package, especially one as big as this one. and in this case, we really are seeing a tug-of-war between moderate democrats who want to hold a vote on this as a stand alone measure to ensure that the infrastructure package passes quickly and then you have pelosi and house progressives saying that they want to vote on these two measures in tandem. so it is really, it is difficult to say how this is going in the house. we do know the chamber is in recess but it is very possible that the calculus from pelosi could change between now and when they reconvene next month. tia, the new york times reports that this deal is, quote, one of the most significant steps to date by lekked republicans to defy mr. trump, not only by the moderates who have broken with him but by a wider group that my signal his
that is what happened is within the scope of a sitting member of congress s duty. i think the op-ed was pretty decisively in favor of saying no, that isn t the case and department of justice should take strong steps here to send a message that should not be tolerated and surely outside the bounds of what we expect of our lekked officials. right. it makes the fair point it s outside of any official duties. you have a protection of official duties. if you re out doing a political thing that may or may no relate to inciting violence, there s a tough question there about whether you cross the line. there s an easy question it was not in your official duties as a member of congress. it s an arguable betrayal of oath. as office, your analysis was perfectly clear and i will say so was your zoom shot, which is more than we could say for any technical difficulties that are our fault which we apologize for. thank you. thanks for having me.
and in this instance, he s done nothing. all he s done is pour fuel on a flame that has been burning since he got lekked. . one of the things people pointed to is the president was critical of president obama for not using the term radical islamic terrorism. to describe some attacks by muslims. why is it he hasn t in the last few days used the term white supremacist terrorism to describe this? because he doesn t lead and he is part of the problem. he is the one that is inciting this violence and hate. if i was president, i would use my department of justice to actually investigate white supremacy. to make sure that we knew what these groups were doing. i would make sure we d infiltrate these groups to make sure we could stop these kinds of terrorist attacks. this is what democratic terrorism looks like. and we should be using our resources. the department of justice. our investigative arms with the fbi to actually root out this kind of terrorism at home. one of the things that