mind? that s really the subtext of all the conversations about whether the russian president is actually willing to drive humanity to the brink of a nuclear disaster. i bet it s keeping president biden up at night. how about you? how are you sleeping since president biden used the word armageddon ? i ll ask how close he thinks we are to the brink and what options are on the table in our exclusive interview. as biden noted n ukraine, putin s choices, his options are narrowing. translator: we will defend our land by all means at our disposal. we ll do everything to ensure the security of our people. breaking ut our putin-english, english-putin dictionary, what he means by land is ukraine. our people, he means the ukrainians who have taken up arms to stop him. when he says about the by any means at our disposal, that s rhetoric that has gone nuclear. translator: is u.s. is is the only country in the world to have used nuclear weapons on two occasions, resulting in the des
actor? as vladimir putin lost his mind? that is really the subtext of all of the conversations about whether the russian president is actually willing to drive humanity to the brink of a nuclear disaster. i bet it s keeping president biden up at night, how about you? how are you sleeping ever since president biden used the word armageddon. just a moment last president biden outright how close he thinks we really are to the brink. what options are on the table? as biden noted, putin s choice isn t options are narrowing. we will defend our land by all means. we will secure the security of our people. are english putin dictionary right here, when he says we will defend our land what he means our land is the 18% of ukraine and he just declared part of russia. and by our people he means the ukrainians who have taken up arms to stop them. and races by all means, that is rhetoric that has gone nuclear. the u.s. is only country in the world have used nuclear weapons on two occasi
an important question, and that s our second point about where putin finds himself. has the west failed to take putin seriously enough? i mean, the evidence suggests that we have and that one american president after another has tried to appease him to avoid this very moment in which we find ourselves today, passing chamber s umbrella like a relay baton. in 2000 as president bill clinton was wrapping up his time into office, putin leveled the chechen capital city of grozny. thousands of civilians were killed, and clinton s attitude was this. i think that the united states can do business with this man. what i have seen of him so far indicates to me that he s capable of being a very strong and effective and straightforward leader. since then, president after president has hoped for the best and watched the worst happen.
seriously enough? the evidence suggests that we have. one american president after the other has tried to appease him to avoid this very moment in which we find ourselves today. passing the umbrella like a relay baton. but as bill clinton wrapped up their stepping into office, thousands of civilians were killed. clinton s attitude was this i think the united states can do business with this. what i ve seen of them so far indicates to me that he is capable of being a strong, effective and capable leader. president after president has hope for the best and