public actions. calling on the russians to hack his opponent s emails. what we know about how he s attempted to obstruct justice. we ll find out more when mueller finishes his investigation. i think to kind of bring these two threads together, one of the things the president will have to deal with squarely at some point, the sdny investigation started as part of the mueller probe and referred off to the southern district of new york. they accused the president of committing a crime. i think if he wasn t the president of the united states he would be getting ready to be indicted or deep in plea negotiations. i suspect the same is true from the obstruction of justice angle. we don t know about the russia side at least with direct criminality for the fortunate. we would be looking at getting ready for an indictment there. if they have concluded that the president has committed a crime, we re there with the southern district of new york and
has never listened to advice or counsel from anyone smarter than him because in his own mind already no people smarter than him. he has been allowed to engage in this behavior for behavior for professional life, never having to report to a board of directors. never having to report to anyone. so now he is totally, you know, without shackles, without boundaries. and it s caught up to us. and this country is now in the middle of a situation where we have a president, as steve pointed out, as you pointed out, he could be indicted today if he were not president of the united states. he may still be indicted. by the way speak of indictment, i said last block the supreme court would determine that they had to indict donald trump. that s not the supreme court s job. let me phrase that more carefully. what i mean to say is that if given this case and if they have to make the decision, they may