Acts 25th anniversary, a panel of government officials and policymakers discuss their role in implementing the legislation. This 80 Minute Program was cohosted by the National Security archive. The carnegie corporation, the Carnegie Endowment and the Nuclear Threat initiative. Ladies and gentlemen, thank you very much for your attention. We have some real heroes of the implementation of nonlugar. I turn this panel over to David Hoffman to moderate the biographies of these extraordinary individuals. They are in your program. I will not spend our time going over those, but i want to turn it to David Hoffman for his penetrating questions and authoritarian moderation. [laughter] david thank you all again for joining us for the second panel. You heard in the first panel some discussion about the hopes and also some of the disappointments, but where the rubber meets the road is where this panel is about. Is about implementation. And as all of us know from 25 years of experience, it is one th
Acts 25th anniversary, a panel of government officials and policymakers discuss their role in implementing the legislation. This 80 Minute Program was cohosted by the National Security archive. The carnegie corporation, the Carnegie Endowment and the Nuclear Threat initiative. Ladies and gentlemen, thank you very much for your attention. We have some real heroes of the implementation of nonlugar. I turn this panel over to David Hoffman to moderate the biographies of these extraordinary individuals. They are in your program. I will not spend our time going over those, but i want to turn it to David Hoffman for his penetrating questions and authoritarian moderation. [laughter] david thank you all again for joining us for the second panel. You heard in the first panel some discussion about the hopes and also some of the disappointments, but where the rubber meets the road is where this panel is about. Is about implementation. And as all of us know from 25 years of experience, it is one th
Implementation of nonlugar. I turn this panel over to David Hoffman to moderate the biographies of these extraordinary individuals. They are in your program. I will not spend our time going over those, but i want to turn it to David Hoffman for his penetrating questions and authoritarian moderation. [laughter] david thank you all again for joining us for the second panel. You heard in the first panel some discussion about the hopes and also some of the disappointments, but where the rubber meets the road is where this panel is about. Is about implementation. And as all of us know from 25 years of experience, it is one thing to give a good speech on the senate floor, it is another thing to get a missile silo closed in ukraine. And i hope this panel will help us understand how some of those accomplishments were actually carried out. It is my experience in my reporting that there were hundreds, probably thousands of people involved in this implementation. They are not all here. But in my
The nuclear deal and those who do not to introduce an act you can watch the rest of this program on our website cspan. Org. Leaving it here as health and Human Services dr. Tom price testifies on the president s 2018 budget request. The budget could cut funding by 18 or 15 billion. Good morning, mr. Secretary, its genuinely my pleasure to welcome you to the subcommittee on labor, health and Human Services and education. Were looking forward to hearing your testimony. Mr. Secretary, your responsibilities are many. Your departments responsible for insuring proper payment, overseeing medical search, helping families break the cycle of poverty and protecting our nation against bioterror and pandemic events. The cuts proposed in the budget blueprint are extensive and span the reach of your agency. I believe theres always fat that can be trimmed and priorities that can be reordered. But i will ask you some questions this morning about whether this budget leaves america sufficiently prepared
Thank you mr. Clerk. So first colleagues im introducing a request for a hearing in september about Water Conservation in the city to provide our city departments participate recreation and Parks Department with an opportunity to talk about the steps their taxing theres confusion why some water is turned off and plant watering is not happening. The second to explore with various departments whether or not legislation is appropriate to require that probably new construction and multi unit buildings have water meters for each invented unit right away right now you can build a multi unit building thats not mediations for water theres no incentive to conservation water or know how much water so use for older buildings its infeasible to shift over to individual meters but at a minimum we should look at this for new construction i was surprised to learn thats not a requirement we will receive a status on increasing the number of watering circling and water use the puc has a number of plans bu