Youre reporting a lot of inconsistencies, but overall did this rape even occur . She could be grossly wrong about the facts or making it up or something in between. Have you been able to ascertain from your reporting whether she was assaulted . Thats difficult to tell, of course. Her friends believe something happened to her and they believe something awful and traumatic and horrific. And those based on the evidence that they have seen, thats what they believe. Ive spoken to two people who saw her in the immediate aftermath of the incident and both of them say they absolutely believe something happened, just maybe not exactly what was reported in Rolling Stone. Looking at the facts, one of the things is whether an assault occurred of some sort and the whole idea of putting it in the Public Domain and how well you do your fact checking. The Rolling Stone is getting barbecued by everybody about its reporting. Tell me, what did you determine to be when doing your reporting, what did you l
evidence that links them. maybe this will convince allf oamerica there was no collusion. one of the biggest take aways with regards to this is the fact that flynn seems to have provided a lot of inform for this investigation. when you look through athe documents. 19 different sessions, 50 different pieces of redakzs. there s a lot of information that was provided. we have to remember the timeline. this is someone who lied to the fbi. this is someone who sally yates said was compromised and needed to get out of the white house. also big news is there is we ve confirmed a separate criminal investigation that he has supposedly provided a lot of information about. much of which was redacted.
let s talk about the special counsel s decision regarding michael flynn. what does this tell you about the current investigation? that the investigation is probably going to go on longer than people expect. i ve been cautioning everyone don t think the special counsel is about to wrap up just because new filings come about. this filing yesterday indicates with all the redakzs that the special counsel is in no rush to wrap things up. this level of cooperation remember this was some time ago, tells us he s been helping the special counsel s office for some time and many tenderals off the investigation. it s leakly to go on for some period longer. seems like he s been meeting with him monthly after the course of of the last year. one of the elements suggests
and finally tonight a breaking news report that we want to bring you to the less redakted version of the house intelereport. and know that james comey made a shocking admission that he testified and fbi saw no physical indication of deception for former national security advisor mike flynn despite telling bret baier something different. that is it a line. catherine herridge. it takes pageses on 53 and 54. reporter: good evening. the new version was released a short time before. it is a cleaner section and fewer redakzs. michael flynn who pled get of one count of making a false
we re comcast. the only isp legally bound by full net neutrality rules. a fight in washington tonight over tomorrow s release of the senate intelligence report on the alleged torture of cia prisoners. tonight some insist the release of the report will lead to violence against u.s. embassies and western personnel in the middle east. katherine joins us tonight. what is this report? this report is about 6,000 pages long, though all the public will be able to see is a declassified executive summary that s about 500 pages and it was finished in the summer but there s a lengthy negotiation between the cia and the senate committee over the redakzs. and what we expect is this will finally be released tomorrow. so who s objecting?