Youre reporting a lot of inconsistencies, but overall did this rape even occur . She could be grossly wrong about the facts or making it up or something in between. Have you been able to ascertain from your reporting whether she was assaulted . Thats difficult to tell, of course. Her friends believe something happened to her and they believe something awful and traumatic and horrific. And those based on the evidence that they have seen, thats what they believe. Ive spoken to two people who saw her in the immediate aftermath of the incident and both of them say they absolutely believe something happened, just maybe not exactly what was reported in Rolling Stone. Looking at the facts, one of the things is whether an assault occurred of some sort and the whole idea of putting it in the Public Domain and how well you do your fact checking. The Rolling Stone is getting barbecued by everybody about its reporting. Tell me, what did you determine to be when doing your reporting, what did you l
party on the night in question? could they just be mistaken? or could it be a nonofficial party? we ve obviously looked into everything we can. we re looking to confirm with fraternity members who were there at that time and we ve spoken to several off the record and on the record. we re looking to do as best as we can to confirm that. but so far no proof that there was a party there, official or unofficial that night? they said there was not a party. one of her stories well, one of the things she says according to rolling stone is one of her assaulters worked as a lifeguard, is that correct? that s what she said. she worked as a lifeguard as well? that s what she said. that s what she said. now and that s what the rolling stone reported, right? correct. what did your real reporting show? we reported that no member of the fraternity was a lifeguard or worked at the aquatic fitness center that entire time of the night in question. did you have you had