the basis of that stomach contents junk science that michael was convicted. from the autopsy with vaginal swabs, rectal swabs, oral swabs, all the usual stuff, clippings, we were having those things tested thinking that would reveal the assailant. and so those results were coming back all negative negative negative. in february of 2005, we filed our first motion. and we sought dna testing on the swabs from christine s body. we asked for the bloody bandanna found 100 yards behind the house along what we always believed to be the escape route of the murderer to be dna tested. john bradley was the district attorney of williamson county at the time we filed the motion for dna testing. so i called up mr. bradley and i introduced myself. and i tried to explain to him the logic of what we were doing,
stomach contents alone. all of the medical literature then and of course now says that. dr. byers didn t see the body until it was too late to do a rigor mortis or liver mortis analysis. so he did this stomach contents analysis. and really it was probably on the basis of that stomach contents junk science that michael was convicted. from the autopsy with vaginal swabs, rectal swabs, oral swabs, all the usually stuff clippings we were having those things tested thinking that would reveal the assailant. and so those results were coming back all negative negative negative. in february of 2005, we filed our first motion. and we sought dna testing on the swabs from christine s body. we asked for the bloody bandanna found 100 yards behind the house along what we always believed to be the escape route of the