and we love death. if you re going to be pessimistic, it s not a good thing, and i think this could well be the ultimate bad news. 0k, thing, and i think this could well be the ultimate bad news. ok, that s me! . , be the ultimate bad news. ok, that s me! ., , ., be the ultimate bad news. ok, that s me! ., ., me! that s you, and that s what we love! we love me! that s you, and that s what we love! we love that. me! that s you, and that s what we love! we love that. ? me! that s you, and that s what we love! we love that. ? don t - me! that s you, and that s what we love! we love that. ? don t forget. love! we love that. ? don t forget about human stupidity, either. , pippa is back! professor sir nigel shadbolt, this is why i love hearing about from these people out there. there is apocalypse across the centuries, people who say it will happen in the 17th ofjuly
scientist? i think it is years too late. i worked for 20 scientist? i think it is years too late. i worked for 20 years - scientist? i think it is years too late. i worked for 20 years at l late. i worked for 20 years at london s late. i worked for 20 years at london s science late. i worked for 20 years at london s science museum. | late. i worked for 20 years at - london s science museum. sorry? no, don t london s science museum. sorry? no, don t apologise, london s science museum. sorry? no, don t apologise, i m london s science museum. sorry? no, don t apologise, i m rapt- london s science museum. sorry? no, don t apologise, i m rapt listenl no, don tapologise, i m rapt listen to you. i no, don t apologise, i m rapt listen to ou. ., ~ no, don t apologise, i m rapt listen to ou. ., ~ ., ., ., , ,. . to you. i worked at london s science museum, to you. i worked at london s science museum. and to you. i worked at london s science museum. and if to you. i worked at lon
which allow the people who said that to steal a march on the others. sarah, how worried you? to to steal a march on the others. sarah, how worried you?- sarah, how worried you? to be erfectl sarah, how worried you? to be perfectly honest, sarah, how worried you? to be perfectly honest, nicky, - sarah, how worried you? to be perfectly honest, nicky, good i perfectly honest, nicky, good niorning. perfectly honest, nicky, good morning, i am extremely worried about morning, i am extremely worried about this morning, i am extremely worried about this. having heard all the arguments and to be perfectly honest. arguments and to be perfectly honest. i arguments and to be perfectly honest, i agree with the professor, we need honest, i agree with the professor, we need to honest, i agree with the professor, we need to take a good look at this and for we need to take a good look at this and for now. we need to take a good look at this and for now, we need to put the brakes and fo
such a big population. it s china, us, eu and then india. what happens in india is really important globally in terms of whether this is a success or not. a success or not. let s talk about those on the a success or not. let s talk about those on the fringes a success or not. let s talk about those on the fringes of a success or not. let s talk about those on the fringes of the - a success or not. let s talk about i those on the fringes of the summit, the young global climate activists who have been urging leaders to do better. let s have a listen to one of them. ., ., ., ,., of them. you all have the power here toda to of them. you all have the power here today to be of them. you all have the power here today to be better, of them. you all have the power here today to be better, to of them. you all have the power here today to be better, to remember - of them. you all have the power herej today to be better, to remember that in your today to be better, to remember that i
actually file charges. all right. this case has been referred to the state s attorney and maybe charges will be filed as i believe they should be. so let s take up that part of the case, mark. a year ago there was an update to the law that shifts the burden. it used to be, as it was in your case with robert zimmerman, that you had to plead as an affirmative defense and argue that stand your ground should apply and vitiate, wipe out the homicide, the culpability for the homicide. now it s on the prosecution to do it. so the sheriff says the law is clear. who reviews it? what is the chance for further justice? well, and you re right, chris. back in 2014, what they did was they said once i as the criminal defense attorney present a prima facie case of self-defense, if i show i think i acted in self-defense, now the state has to disprove that self-defense by clear and convincing evidence at the stand your ground hearing. don t forget they always have to disprove self-defense at the