martha: both sides are saying not about the website in the end. one side means one thing in that and the other means something quite different. we ll see what reality is. monica, thanks. thanks. bill: one of the hotter moments came when marcia blackburn, republican from tennessee, talking about medical privacy concerns. joe barton followed up with that, the republican from texas. of the frank pallone, democrat from new jersey slammed all of them calling it a monkey court. saying patient s medical information is not at risk, based on his reading of the law. whatever the case with that, the hearing continues. ed henry is standing by live on north lawn. much because there s a moment the president will be out here talking about not this, not healthcare.gov, but actually screen right, he will be talking about immigration. now, ed, what is that all about? how much attention is the white house giving what s happening down the street of pennsylvania avenue? reporter: well they re giveing a
manslaughter, then you put out the question to the judge for manslaughter, and then it was basically because of the jury s reading of the law, that everybody finally decided, manslaughter doesn t hold? that s exactly why. was there any holdout? there was a holdout. and probably well, we had another vote. and then everybody voted put it in a little tin, we had a little tin, folded our little papers and put it in the vote, and she was the last one to vote, and it took probably another 30 minutes before her to decide that she could not find anything else to hold george on, because, you want to find him guilty of something. she wanted to find him guilty of something, but couldn t because of the law, the way the law is written. he wasn t responsible for negligible things that he had done, leading up to that point.
manslaughter, then you put out the question to the judge for manslaughter, and then it was basically because of the jury s reading of the law, that everybody finally decided, manslaughter doesn t hold? that s exactly why. was there any holdout? there was a holdout. and probably well, we had another vote. and then everybody voted put it in a little tin, we had a little tin, folded our little papers and put it in the vote, and she was the last one to vote, and it took probably another 30 minutes before her to decide that she could not find anything else to hold george on, because, you want to find him guilty of something. she wanted to find him guilty of something, but couldn t because of the law, the way the law is written. he wasn t responsible for
manslaughter, and then it was basically because of the jury s reading of the law, that everybody finally decided, manslaughter doesn t hold? that s exactly why. was there any holdout? there was a holdout. and probably well, we had another vote. and then everybody voted put it in a little tin, we had a little tin, folded our little papers and put it in the vote, and she was the last one to vote, and it took probably another 30 minutes before her to decide that she could not find anything else to hold george on, because, you want to find him guilty of something. she wanted to find him guilty of something, but couldn t because of the law, the way the law is written. he wasn t responsible for negligible things that he had done, leading up to that point.
could apply to what. because i mean, there was a couple of them in there that wanted to find him guilty of something. and after hours and hours and hours of deliberating over the law and reading it over and over and over again and we decided there s just no way other place to go. can you talk about the process of the other jurors changing their minds? you talked about the first juror went from second-degree murder to manslaughter, then put out the question to the judge for manslaughter. and then it was basically because of the jury s reading of the law, that everybody finally decided manslaughter doesn t hold? that s exactly right. was there any holdout? there was a holdout.