was sworn into office. off and this time the u.s. responded, killing at least eight iranian fighters in atn least two counterstrikes. but a fefiw hours later, undeterred, iranian proxy forces were at it again.a felaunching a series of new rocket attacks against the u.s. installation in the region, injuring even more us service members. the situation on the ground and over the skies in syria, it is not good to say the least. meanwhile, our commander ingood chief,. joe biden, was in ottawa, canada today having a grand old time adjust with justin and his socialist friends in canada s parliament. watch. good afternoon, mohajer. canada. we re going to move five thousand five hundred electric charging stations. guess some union workers, in the words canadian and colonel john mccrie still call to us from flanders field, echoing their charge through the ages. and i quote it to you, from falling from failure for m me fo to you, from failing hands. t we throw the torch to you t
but it s dangerous what s happening in syria rightattack , attacks, retaliations, re escalations. bout our where could this lead and what does it say about our presence in the region fee and how iran feels?ls well, this is actually ann we illustrative example of what when we talk about the difference between projecting weakness and projecting strength. look, i appreciate the fact resd that the biden administration responde d to the iranian attacks, at least this time,stan unlike afghanistan, wher we the response was to accidentally kill a van fullv of ten afghan kidsan, this timea at least they hit their target.. but they but they didn t send the response that secretary auston believed that they would, because, as you pointed out, within hours, irand fired off seven more rockets and more injuries to us forces, compared the same situation three years ago when a us contractor was killed. u.s a proportionate response, ut sending the right message was we decided to take out the head