here seconds ago. so, christopher steele is all over. this now you wonder why senator grassley and senator graham got together and essentially want to talk to him again. they actually want to bring up criminal charges about chris steele for not telling the truth among other things. steve: ultimately in the past we have heard that they have been the republican investigators have been going after the people in the fbi and in the department of justice now it is clear they are taking on president obama s state department. to see what role they had in the collection and dissemination of anti-trump information that ultimately wound up in front of the fisa court. brian: headed by john kerry who was rumored to have just told the palestinian leader don t worry trump is going to be out there in a year. we are in year two. why would he be off. why we say that. unverified although specific. he in there. mark levin on his show saying yesterday look out, this is getting to president obama. ainsley
brian: judge, you said if they shade it, if devin nunes is shading it. what makes you think he is or do you think is he shading raw intelligence. i do not know that criticism of congressman nunes is they have known this for a year. and they sat on this while the congress voted to expand fisa. the rest of the congress should have been informed of this before they voted yes or no on expanding fisa. when did this come out? the day. brian: this is a separate issue. the day after president trump signed it we have heard two versions. when we went to bed last night 6:00 tomorrow. i got up this morning. the stuff i m reading is saying 10:00 this morning. so we don t know. we are sitting on pins and needles. this better be as advertised. if this is being advertised as more than it, is, we are wasting our time. steve: have to vote on it if they change the language. that s a good question. democrats on the committee are saying because the republican also have voted on something that s diffe
looking. jesse: dana, what do you say about this? do you think it could be kgb style surveillance? dana: i m going to wait. i don t want to just see the memo. i would like to see the underlying evidence, the raw intelligence. jesse: will wear perceive that? dana: i don t know. i think congress has an oversight response building they re trying executed. i do think they ve made an error. they think that they are able to say this memo has nothing to do with the bob mueller investigation. that s what the speaker said today on the floor. they are trying to say there s a separation. the end i don t see how they ve actually effectively made that case because pretty much everybody was watching this is like, it s carter page, connected to the fisa warrant. he worked on the trump campaign and therefore bob mueller. i don t think that s been successful and there s another thing. when we talked about the fisa act, one of the things this most part about it is how you have foreign terrorists
through this. he s looking at it as a piece of the puzzle he s trying to put together. but a significant piece because of its impact. yeah. steve, keith schiller was very specific, saying that the russians offered to send five women to trump s hotel room. five women. why do you think he was so specific like that? you know, it s unclear as to whether he was just trying to remember it as best he could. i mean, one of the other things it s worth remembering that he was also very specific about was the fact that he stayed outside of trump s hotel room for a couple of minutes. so at least we know for that period of time there was nobody taking anybody up on any offers. past that i suppose we re not sure. we just don t know. but jumping on to what both john and julia have said with regard to the dossier, just because a piece of it and i m certainly not an positively gist for it, but having seen a lot of raw intelligence in my day, what you have in the dossier is a series of freestanding
to the dossier, just because a piece of it and i m certainly not an apologist for it, but having seen a lot of raw intelligence in my day, what you have in the dossier is a series of freestanding reports from separate sources. so this isn t something that if you find one piece that s wrong or one piece that s a little bit off or something is misspelled, you just dispel the whole thing and get rid of all of it and throw it out the window. that s not the case. you have a bunch of individual reports sourced back to folks, individual sources that mr. steele was essentially running as intelligence assets inside of russia. so this is not a monolithic document. these are a collection of documents, some of which might be very accurate, have turned out to be pretty accurate and others which have yet to be proven or might be entirely inaccurate. julie, i need to get your reaction to cnn s exclusive reporting that white house policy adviser stephen miller has been interviewed as part of mue