because what this committee is going to do and what the speaker has clearly already demonstrated he s going to do, is they re going to discard the fact and attack people personally and endanger their lives. i have to tell you, from, again, the national security perspective, not only am i concerned that they re going to launch an all-out attack on fbi people, never mind the constant erosion of the institution, but now people i assure you are going to come under attack. and that s very dangerous. we ve already seen attacks at fbi offices. but further, don t forget, we see people not on the intelligence committee writing in to practice that they will get the intelligence briefings ordinarily provided only to the intelligence committee, so people like jim jordan and others want their hands on the real, live, raw intelligence that s briefed very discreetly to the intelligence committee. we re going to see threats, extortion, blackmail-type
Will mainsteam media heads roll over Trump Russiagate fraud?
rt.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from rt.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
told the new york times in 2020 that he was dealing in, quote-unquote, raw intelligence. and charles dolan himself was tasked with asking along gossip, rumor and hearsay. even the people perpetrating this knew they were dealing in insubstantial allegations. so how did it happen? as kim just described it, for over two years major media outlets in the united states and the fbi and the congress, adam schiff s learings, purported hearings, purported to pursue all of these allegations in the mueller investigation against donald trump. i think we re understanding now, david, why the durham investigation has taken so long. man, this is a shocker. david: it sure is. and, kim, it also reshines the spotlight on the fbi. clearly, there were so many red flags here about the information
compromising information about candidate trump that they could use his leverage over him, all of those reports were published a month after the elections, called the steele dossier. in september 2016, these things were not publicly known at all. these individual raw intelligence reports that were coming, and from a source, landed at the fbi. that s how that top counter a television s official peter strzok, described those reports. when he published a book about his experience last year. he said quote, what was significant about the material, is that it confirmed information, and players, that we knew to be accurate and in consistent with the way putin in the russians were operating. many other pieces of steals information, most of them in fact, we re devilishly hard to either prove or refute. but, the fbi s top counterintelligence official, he had to try. his team created a spreadsheet,
talk about special relationship between the us and the united kingdom, which i personally am not terribly enthusiastic about, one of the areas where we work unbelievably closely, weed the brits work unbelievably closely with united states, as opposed to any country in the world, is on intelligence. you can be pretty sure that any time of the day or night, british intelligence, us intelligence are working very closely together. but raw intelligence, then analysed and then passed on to governments and politicians, that can become something quite different. you may have an agent in the field discover something really significant but by the time that piece on intelligence is processed, homogenised, passes through all the levels and finally arrives on the desk of the prime minister or the president, it may be something quite different. so, you ve got to be very careful how you ve got to be very careful how you took that intelligence because
vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.