The Supreme Court ruled that the classification of land as Pushtaini (ancestral) and Gair-Pushtaini (non-ancestral) for the purpose of compensation for land acquired by the Greater Noida authority would be bad in law, and liable to be set aside.
The Supreme Court ruled that the classification of land as 'Pushtaini' (ancestral) and 'Gair-Pushtaini' (non-ancestral) for the purpose of compensation for land acquired by the Greater Noida authority would be "bad in law, and liable to be .
It stressed that ancestry as a concept, especially before times of modern private property ownership, had remained to be a tool for inclusivity and not exclusion.A be
It stressed that ancestry as a concept, especially before times of modern private property ownership, had remained to be a tool for inclusivity and not exclusion.A be