means that you are putting party over country, definitionally. i mean, this is if if somebody trying to overturn an election, incite an insurrection, and continue to lie about it. um, if that s not too far, what is? the answer is nothing. john, um, i want so, appears to me i have been saying this all along. i think that the republican party kind of wants the control similar to what stuart was saying about power but wants to have a party that is unified, regardless of what it s behind. you know, i don t think it s anything good. they want trumpism, so to speak, but they don t necessarily want trump. do you understand what i am saying? they think he is too toxic and they are going to lose with him but they sort of want the control and and the things that he stood for, and the judges and all of that. does that make sense? do you understand what i am saying? yeah, i understand what you are saying and that s one of the many rationalizations that get trotted out when people
that? it will backfire. his rationalizations are insipid, his excuses are vacuous. what was so offensive is that he blamed the victims and said they are diminishing actual victims of sexual assault. that is such a despicable, detestable comment but it speaks volumes about andrew cuomo. sean: gregg jarrett and tammy bruce, great to have you. we will be watching this closely. after the break, leo terrel 2.0, he will react to the olympic games. in tokyo some athletes continue to promote, well, they don t like playing under the american flag. my question is, then why are you there? others are proud to wear the red, white, and blue. we will tell you about one and you need it here.
her, we re going to approve her. joining me now, tara suttmeier, adviser to the lincoln project,s former gop communications director. maia wiley, msnbc legal analyst and civil rights attorney, and back with us sunday show special correspondent aunt gloria. thank you all very much for coming to the sunday show. tara, talk to me about senator blunt. talking about judge jackson, it sounded like he was talking about somebody who was running for miss conjeaniality. she has a great personality. she ll be great with her colleagues. but she doesn t meet the criteria. what in the what? hey, jonathan. listen, it s absurd. the rationalizations that republicans are trying to put forth for not supporting this woman are just asinine and they
country that we are one and to show the world we re united in our outrage against the terrible violence that we just experienced. i thought after january 6th what we all witnessed, what i witnessed, one of the last people off the house floor, i saw these people face-to-face, i thought when that was all over with, something similar would happen. we would come together and all speakers be one and all committed to getting the truth. that didn t happen. you know, the lack of curiosity, the lack of outrage, the rationalizations of why we shouldn t be compelling people to testify, just stunning to me. a number of people have said it, i know you have as well, you
pointing out, here s a picture of him and jeffrey epstein. but they say, trump was going under cover to take down jeffrey epstein. the amount of rationalizations they find to have this undying loyalty to trump apparently never ceases. i feel like somebody outside this looking in on it, the one thing that it always seemed to me is a cultish manifestation of trump support rather than being a cult this exists on its own that happens to attach itself to trump. it does feel endemic to the phenomenon, but that will be tested over time as all of these things have been. will summer, reporter for the daily beast. thanks for helping us understand this weird moment. pressure you being here. thanks for having me. much more news ahead. stay with us. stay with us