that there s a certain fascination with technology that once you have it you want to have it everywhere so the ubiquity of technology is almost automatic in itself and this is ethically highly. alarming because it s all it all. it s not at all clear that wherever we can replace people but technological systems it s a good thing to do it. and the costs are also fascinating as i mentioned before with medication this technology we re talking about chile it costs a lot. surely it costs a lot but it s probably gated with the promise to save costs i mean that s one of the main rationalizations of pervasive technology they always tell you it s going to save costs at least in the long run is almost never true especially not in health care costs simply are exploding whatever you do so. what road are we going
chemical weapon use is becoming normalized, from and indonesian airport to a english village, to the homes and hospitals of syria. since the assad regime used chemical weapons a year ago, they have been reportedly used dozens of times. and this council does nothing. what we re dealing with today is not about a spat between the united states and russia. this is about the inhumane use of chemical agents on innocent civilians. each and every one of the nations in this council are on record opposing the use of chemical weapons. that can be no rationalizations for our failure to act. we have already introduced and circulated to the council a resolution demanding unrestricted humanitarian access to the people of douhma. assad is doing all he can t to
this. you can have all these rationalizations and have political left and right and have all these motives. you still get counse down to why would someone want to do this? why would someone want to put a trip wire device out in a place where some mother with a stroller with a baby or two kids going to a little league game would trip it and die? why would someone want to do that? that s a part of human nature we still don t have an answer to. brian: two people died steven and ray len, a 17-year-old. i know steve have you been talking to an expert and have you been talking to terry. i m sure have you some questions. steve: absolutely right. terry, it was about 48 hours ago here in austin when the chief of police came out and essentially engaged the bomber. and he said we would like to open a dialogue with you. so, go ahead and contact us.
trapped, incredulously on his part by comey and mueller. nothing seemed to move on from those two events. in the instance of comey and mueller beyond all the dodging and weaving rationalizations, there really wasn t anybody other than the president s family who didn t very pointedly blame trump himself. this is the point at which an emperor s new clothes threshold was crossed. now you could doubt outloud his judgment and acumen and advice he is getting. he s not only crazy declared tom barrack to a friend, he s stupid much i should point out we have not independently verified that quote as coming from the president s friend, tom barrack. but there is a lot of reporting in the book that people did not hold donald trump intelligence in very high regard. yeah, that s certainly true. you see members of his cabinet saying it, members of his staff saying it. and with respect to this decision, look, this decision to
reckoning on capitol hill. unfortunately, it s being forced upon them and not doing it of their own volition. harris: what does this look like with regard? because it s a good question, the thing that s really and comfortable for everyone involved in this and everyone on capitol hill is that is one thing that has to be bipartisan. you cannot have one of the action or one side and another for your own. that is unacceptable and inappropriate and that s what these rationalizations. you re absolutely right about the personal responsibility to people who come forward as victims on capitol hill, there were the ones who were sent to sensitivity training. there were the ones who were essentially sent to purgatory before they re allowed to come forward and make any sort of claim. and that s just a financial claim amount but where is the responsibility because as we have seen, if someone is accused of something, an angry mob goes after their sponsors. and in that person is unceremoniously take