they actually want this to go forward as fast as possible and so they will let go of the co-conspirators, correct? that is key to this. 100%, this is a fast-moving rail road without any concern for justice. speedy trial rights are a defendant s speedy trial right, a citizen s speedy trial right. not the government. government has obligation to ensure fair trial and in this case we need a journey to the truth, not a railroading of an citizen, let alone a former president. this is strategic move by biden administration to get to trial as quickly as possible for whatever reason and we know the reason, they think they can do better in district of columbia than in more diverse state like florida. laura: that is harder for you
we heard the government representative saying it is a finely balanced political and moral choice, but you believe they made the wrong one? i but you believe they made the wrong one? ~ , ., ., ., one? i think you heard it earlier, this has united one? i think you heard it earlier, this has united every one? i think you heard it earlier, this has united every political - this has united every political party in northern ireland and indeed the opposition. there is no doubt about the need for a solution to address legacy issues of the troubles but of the bill is not the way to do it and railroading a bill through parliament is not the way to do it, it puts it in the hands of the victims. do it, it puts it in the hands of the victims- do it, it puts it in the hands of the victims. , , ., ., , ., the victims. did you feel that your concerns were the victims. did you feel that your concerns were ignored? the victims. did you feel that your concerns were ignored? i - the victims. did
and then go on to become lawyers and start screwing around with the legal system and railroading conservatives, fine ones like myself? harold: i would agree, you are a good one. here is the thing. intellectual diversity, i remember when i was in college and law school and even high school, we came together to challenge our school, to teach more american history and more world history in a world history class we had at my high school in d.c., and they allowed us to come before the board at the school that made those decisions, the academic board, and we had a great back and forth. they challenged us, we challenge them come in over a period of time they began to open up the curriculum in many ways. it was an enrichment. we had these huge balls and intellectual brawls, no brawl physically, violently. if you cannot entertain and sit and have a substantive and good debate with someone whom you disagree with, you are not going to be a good lawyer. you are not going to get into a