quo. then there is a witch hunt. there is no there there. trump tweeted yesterday it is still the perfect calm. it s not a real defense. if i m trump, it is an opportunity to preview my defense by being able to planned those seeds of doubt in the public. fundamentally, you are going to see not a railroading. it s not going to be a kangaroo court or anything like that. in fact, heavily what will occur on wednesday is an education provided to the american public as to what do the framers mean when they say high crimes and misdemeanors. we will hear from four scholars. they will explain what the impeachment concept is that predates somebody like donald trump and why did the framers intend on putting that remedy there to be able remove somebody like a corrupt president like donald trump. so i think if you have the opportunity to watch and listen. if you are a member of the american public, not only will members of congress get that in
offense is whatever the houses it is. because at that point, it s political. steve: it s all political. brian: this is what republicans are saying. number one, i would like to subpoena a few witnesses it might balance out the one we just heard. the democrats will go don t think so. as unfair as that sounds, the rules permit that. steve: yeah. congressman schiff is not making up the rules he is following the rules. brian: you understand, judge, your whole career is built on fairness. you are trying to give the american people a shot at fairness. yes, i agree with you, brian, here is where this could come back to bite those who don t want the republicans to introduce witnesses at the polls. if the whole perception of this thing is rail roading and not fair, the people who did the railroading will suffer at the polls. i thought the clintons, which all of us covered, if you may remember, i thought the clinton impeachment was fair. but a lot of the republicans who managed it suffered
it s almost dear leaderish, does it prove kelly s point that the railroading democrats generally as opposed to sink money into it president is surrounded by yes men, or in this case, yes women. and an underperformer. i disagree with the they re throwing out other statement. i don t think it s an inappropriate statement for the issues and let let s talk about white house to make about a couple of races and biden someone who served our country showing a double-digit lead over with such distinction. i think he had a few moments senator elizabeth warren and that were missteps including the bernie sanders and another respected survey from quinnipiac handling of the white house staff secretary situation which shows warren out front. was mishandled, but overall, i is biden over confident? think general kelly did a great biden certainly is coming job for the administration and i into this with the value of name would just advise the white house that these people who leave your administrati
worrying about parliament. is the idea of a no-deal brexit basically established in the set and unusual case for that to be turned around? when you saw the outrage of jeremy corbyn. in boris johnson s party, there is so much outrage and looks like they re railroading through and not everybody is in favor of brexit. the no deal brexit is part of that. the harshest bit is really popular. allies of the prime minister, they ll do everything they can to try to stop it. looks like they re out of options. theresa may talks about an irish backstop. many are worried of a fallout of a no-deal brexit. they re worried of real problems on the northern ireland border. what s the plan for that? you have to bear with me here, it is complicated. it is the main reason boris
that was in a different way she was using reason, but she was just as much of a strong warrior. jesse: they didn t do it blindly. chuck grassley sent out investigator after investigator to find these people, these alleged witnesses and take sworn depositions. they offered to go to california to hear this person out. they spent hours and days and weeks trying to get the facts of the case, so it s not like they just blindly said we are going to hold the line. they were remarkably open to hearing credible allegations. juan: i think you are rewriting history but i am delighted to hear it. it s always entertaining. you are rewriting history because what happened was a republican railroading of the fbi process. they didn t even get maximum time? jesse: the time crunch was feinstein. dagen: every democratic senator on the judiciary committee, every single one, hours after, the avenatti and the swetnick allegations which