legislative certainty that relates to the investigation. but just anything that could potentially relate to congress legitimate legislative purpose of creating our laws. so as long as they can tie it to that, they can access this information. and this kind of level of evidence that there s something curious afoot, probably gives them the authority to conduct the investigation. so the washington post is also reporting that the administration dismissed the complaint as quote flimsy, because it was based on conversations with other government officials. do you think that the secondhand information here ends up being important? or unimportant? i mean what, wouldn t an investigation actually determine that? we ve been hearing a lot about the word hearsay lately. but i want people to stop using this word. it is a word of, a rule of evidence that only sometimes applies in certain court situations. it s a very, very narrow rule. in reality, in investigations,