experts assembled here tonight, some breaking news. the january 6th committee has subpoenaed donald trump today. using its final hearing to make this historic move, which paves a path to the first ever clash between donald trump and the congress over whether he will show up, speak under oath, tell the truth. that s our top story. tonight we will also be covering other breaking news coming out of the supreme court this afternoon. the supreme court rejecting donald trump s filing in that mar-a-lago stolen documents case. this ruling rebuffs trump s attempt to try to slow down any review of the classified documents, which the government says he stole, and this came out with no dissents, meaning no justice siding with or on behalf of donald trump s position nor his effort to involve the high court in what would be a standard review of stolen stuff. later tonight we ll report on this newly revealed footage from inside the congress in safe zones, bunkers and other rooms where congr
legislative certainty that relates to the investigation. but just anything that could potentially relate to congress legitimate legislative purpose of creating our laws. so as long as they can tie it to that, they can access this information. and this kind of level of evidence that there s something curious afoot, probably gives them the authority to conduct the investigation. so the washington post is also reporting that the administration dismissed the complaint as quote flimsy, because it was based on conversations with other government officials. do you think that the secondhand information here ends up being important? or unimportant? i mean what, wouldn t an investigation actually determine that? we ve been hearing a lot about the word hearsay lately. but i want people to stop using this word. it is a word of, a rule of evidence that only sometimes applies in certain court situations. it s a very, very narrow rule. in reality, in investigations,
the court situations, some of the executive orders put in place early by the trump administration. the racking up the failures created a necessity for trump to pivot, have someone to blame and refocus to try to build as he heads into the 100-day milestone marker. did bannon misplay this? absolutely. from when he put himself on the cover of time magazine and intimating he was the brain of donald trump. great photo. when you do that and move yourself so far up front, particularly with a boss who puts so much value on being on the covers of magazines and has such an identity based upon press coverage. when you put yourself in those positions you re doing so at the detriment of what makes your boss tick. mike, i wonder if an environment where donald trump is routinely criticized by a large segment of the population, with good reason, i wonder if there is a reflexive jolt