well, it s overdone because it s baseless and known to be baseless. what? the outrage is baseless? the outrage is pretend outrage. we have proponents of racial discrimination attacking a justice who says government shouldn t racially discriminate even for supposedly good reasons and he points out and there have been no there s no dispute to the studies, no serious dispute to the studies that rieshl minorities in selective schools where they re placed in the schools because of their race and as a result are placed in a lower part of the class don t do as well as racial minorities who go to schools where they re placed not because of their race but because of their grades and they end up in the middle or the high end of their class, those minorities do better. and racial quos hurt we do as h minorities that are cited in the brief, some from the u.s. commercial on civil rights. i ve read those studies and jeff i want you to comment because you know this better than me, studies t
and money and bill should be brought up on the principle of those what they stand on from the initiative of the member. congressman peter king gave his take on what happened yesterday. he echos the thought of many democrats. let me play what he thinks is wrong. this signals that crazies have taken over. this never happens, a person doing the job the speaker of the house is removed from office by a small faction because they have unreasonable demands, if you don t agree with them, you shut the government down, this is insanity. he says unreasonable demands, the crazies have taken over the party. mr. king ask have his opinions, to call people names and crazies, that s childish. look at the facts, though, in 1989, our country owed $2 trillion in debt. toot we re over 18 trillion in debt. the establishment, the status quos are the ones that have left us there. again, i came from private practice as being a veterinarian
weight. saudi arabia is an important and critical part of that. boeing is at least, what, $10 million to the clinton foundation foundation. 900,000 just months before the saudi contract was approved. it certainly doesn t sound so good. i don t think any one has shown any quid pro quos yet. has hillary criticized saudi arabia. no she hasn t but she s accepted their money. i think she s been more outspoken on women s rights than any woman in the world. be it boeing or saudi arabia or the u.a.e. you don t think they they are giving this money to buy her silence? no. you think they re giving it out of the goodness of their heart. i think strains credulity.
there is a lot of money sloshing around and everything is blurred. and it s not good. and there is a lot here that is real, whether it s quid pro quos or not who knows. but the amount of schmoozing involved and crossing lines and one person putting money in a foundation, and then clinton getting unbelievable amounts for his speeches, and then contracts going one way or another, it s not good. those blurry lines have been seen by many people. i take it you mean many people in the charity field, international relief field? yeah. people that work this places like haiti, for example, saw that this massive machine of state department clinton
pre-imminent liberal economists across the globe he s gone everywhere a tremendous amount of respect from people on the left. i want you to listen to what jeffrey sachs had to say early this morning about the problem for the clintons and their global foundation. there is a lot of money sloshing around and it s everything is blurred. and it s not good. and there is a lot the here that is real. whether quid pro quos or not, who those. but the amount of schmoozing involved and creditsingossing line, one person putting money in a found days clinton getting unbelievable amounts for speeches and contracts going one way or another, it s not good. it s not good can be applied to that clip to the clintons as