kevin mccarthy, the speaker oflf the house, all of his meeting requests. he wouldn t even pick up ta the phone and take mccarthy s calls. he even blaststhy s calls. a go. bill raising the debt limit, the very thing that woulvedry ti tht the u.s. fromwith a defaulting. but now, with the possible pblea default, only twenty two daystoda away, joe biden, well, today he finally met with the speaker ofy the house and the minority leader in the senate. but lat is this a little too? little, too late? we all right.will coming up tonight, we ll ask louisiana senator john kennedy that question. that we start tonight di with this. did the cia activelythe cr helpr joe biden get elected president in the fall of twenty 20 ? did they put a cinder blocke on the scales of the election? s isas is alleged about the fbi? we have a bombshell new report from the house judiciary committee. it is exposing a shocking levele of election malfeasance among tployees at the ciact. according to fox news,
a 20, 20 presidential election. and keep in mind, the ciapliy is explicitly prohibited from interfering in domestic affairds of the united states . so if this person if thismber o a member of f the review board did encourage someone to signlet the letter or was encouraginerg people to get involved in the letter signature, that would be a real crossingto the line. to according to cia expertsnigh i talked to tonight, even some of the witnesses that jim jordan s committee interviewed said , oh, that would be a problem i cf they did ,that would be a bridge too far . so you ve got the cia over its skis on interfering in domesticc policy. if these allegations are corroborated if these a, which i think has jeremy jordan has done, and the fbi going around tryinge and to censor people who actually could call into question w the cia letterho cou to agenciet don t belong in politics, directly involved in the 20 won the election. you could not write this in th a spy novel and be believable. yo
they do not celebrate the freedoms that we cherish and judge. that s what yesterday is all about. that s independence day y is all about. it s a reminder of the vision that our founders had fornd this country. it s a reminder to go back and look at the declaration of independence that tells us that we have these inalienable rights that have beenn put upon us by our creator, the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. and that is where our pride in america comes from.aw that s where we draw the inspiration from on days like f independence day to say, you know, we can agree or disagree on policy. we can be happy or unhappyor with whoever is in charge of the country. but we have to stand together as americans to support defendta the constitution to support and defend these freedoms that make this country what it is and that make us who we areda as american. well, there s no question w and you know what s interesting thing? hawhat what what i i readd michael moore and how disg
illegal immigration. it was just s surreal. but the whole idea of c a ministry of truth, as i call it, or a government disinformation board isn t it? shouldn t be the other way around. shouldn t it be we the people keeping government accountable and who s going toru decide what s true and not true and how do you pickan somebody who s fully responsible for purveying this information to head up this ministry of truth that to me seemsms to be a question w that needs to be answered. and frankly, when you add the border component, i would argue that a strong tha case shd be made that he should be impeached from this job becauseth this has nothing to do with homeland security. but he s certainly incapable ofn securing the border. he could notly answer questionsc you re right. our first amendment says congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech. we ve made no such lawve m. the president s job is to faithfully execute the law. there s no law to execute.
base? all right. maybe a complicated issue but it s a straightforward question. do you support or oppose. that s from the washington post abc poll this past week. here s the fascinating thing. that same poll, the washington post /abc poll asked that same question w, this week, but also asked that exact same question back in 2013 when it was this guy, president obama considering a missile strike in syria. so we not only have the new polling on the question this week, we basically have the act same polling question from 2013. and just look at the response. everybody who has ever told you that democrats and republicans are mirror images of each other, they both have all of the same problems, look at this. look at the democrats numbers first. back in 2013 when it was president obama considering missile strikes in syria, the number of democratic voters who supported that was 38%. now new year, 2017, new