parliament because the laws made it very clear the lords made it clear they do not like it. tt is clear they do not like it. it is probably clear they do not like it. it is probably a clear they do not like it. it is probably a decade clear they do not like it. it is probably a decade perhaps even more since conservative politicians first talked about a british bill of rights. it was in the queen s speech today. rights. it was in the queen s speech toda . ~ ., rights. it was in the queen s speech toda . ~ . ., rights. it was in the queen s speech toda . . . . rights. it was in the queen s speech toda .~ . ., 4. today. what will that look like? this is a difficult today. what will that look like? this is a difficult question i today. what will that look like? i this is a difficult question because we are still trying to work out exactly what it really amounts to. what we know is that dominic raab as deputy prime minister and lord chancellor, head of the legal side of the cons
individual citizens, your viewers, from challenging government positions by ministers. it looks like a grab for power by the conservative government, not enhancing the rights of british people. enhancing the rights of british eo - le. ., enhancing the rights of british eo le. ., ., , enhancing the rights of british n-eole. ., ., ,, enhancing the rights of british eole. ., ., , ., people. covid has obviously been a hue people. covid has obviously been a huge disruption people. covid has obviously been a huge disruption to people. covid has obviously been a huge disruption to some people. covid has obviously been a huge disruption to some political i huge disruption to some political ambitions that the government outlined in 2019. it now looks from the queen speech like they are back on track, talking about levelling up, things the liberal democrat approve of, evening up the money spent on children so every part of the children they get the same amount invested in their educatio
the police been able to act on what my question is to the government is, please make the case because you have failed to make it at all. let’s have failed to make it at all. let s talk about the have failed to make it at all. let s talk about the british have failed to make it at all. let s talk about the british bill - have failed to make it at all. let s talk about the british bill of i talk about the british bill of rights. you were fighting about this when you are in the coalition a decade ago because there were some conservatives, including theresa may, who felt strongly about it. it didn t happen then stop it is going to happen now. to a lot of people it will seem a reasonable way for the british system to assert itself against the european convention. some aspects of which they feel are being over interpreted by english courts. , ., , , being over interpreted by english courts. , , ., ., ., courts. british lawyers who wrote to the convention courts. british lawyers who
is that it is the evidence under thatis is that it is the evidence under that is hotly debated soap while supporters have dominic raab save the human rights act was passed 20 years ago, when you look into the granular levels of the cases which have gone through the courts, a lot of critics say these cases are very few and when the government faces challenges it intends to win because most of the cases which are spurious are weeded out. there is also other confusion which i think the government will have to address. the bill of rights talks about this i think that uk law has primacy over human rights in strasbourg and that is kind of already the case already because our most seniorjudges when faced with a ruling from strasbourg can actually say, we are going to ignore that and go our own way because we think our own way is already human rights compliant. so this is a confusing bill to sell