ashley, good morning. ashley: senator rand paul and dr. fauci butting heads over response to covid-19. rand paul accusing dr. fauci of squashing the wuhan lab issue. to create a quick and devastating published takedown of three prominent epidemiologists and you keep coming back to personal attacks on me that have absolutely no relevance to reality. ashley: fauci accused senator paul of distorting everything about him and paul s quote, usual fashion, and went head-to-head with senator marshall and caught calling him names on a hot mic. my financial disclosures are public knowledge. office cannot find them, where will they be if it is
the last two years there like n no go,. senator paul, good to see yo tonight. thank you. thank you. laura: senator paul hammered fauci about his with nih director francis collins to smear a prominent group of anti lacto and scientists as fringe lunatics. fauci offered no disk defense o this disgusting behavior. in an e-mail exchange you conspire and i quote here directly from the e-mail to create a quick and devastating published takedown of three prominent epidemiologist from harvard, oxford, and stanford. you think it s appropriate to use your $420,000 salary to attack scientists that disagree with you? can get the e-mail you re referring to is an e-mail of dr. laura: look at the semantics
dr. collins, you conspire and i quote here directly from the email, to create a quick and devastating published takedown of three prominent epidemiologists. do you really think it s appropriate to use your $420,000 salary to attack scientists that disagree with you? i think in usual fashion, senator, you are distorting everything about me. as usual, senator, you are incorrect almost everything you said. no, you deny, you deny, but the emails tell the truth of this. no. rachel: congressman, this someone one of the most disturbing things. i m so glad we played this clip for you. it s not just that he was smearing, trying to smear people who disagreed with him, but this went all the way down to other levels. we had dr. peter cory. we saw the weapons of medical licensing. anyone who disagreed with dr. fauci, somehow he was able to communicate all the way down to the hospital level that
they ran out of tests and then they ran out of antibodies and there is no warp speed for the antivirals that every doctor that i talked to phrases. watch the exchange with fauci and centered around paul. you conspire and i could hea directly from the e-mail to create a quick and devastating published takedown of three prominent epidemiologist from harvard, oxford, and stanford. instead of engaging them on the merits, you and doctor collins ought to smear them and take them down. and another journalist and lay press, this is not only antithetical to the scientific method, it s the antipathy of cheap politics. you keep coming back to personal attacks on me that hav absolutely no relevance to reality. you re the one responsible, you re the lead architect for the response from the governmen
co-morbidities. when republicans said that over the last two years, they said no, no, no, trump deserves all the blame. laura: co-morbidity on top of co-morbidity. senator paul, great to see you tonight. senator paul also hammered fauci about his coordinated campaign with then nih director francis collins to summer a prominent group of anti-lockdown scientists as fringe lunatics. but fauci offered no defense of this disgusting behavior. in an email exchange with dr. collins you conspire and i quote directly from the email, to create a quick and devastating published takedown of three prominent epidemiologists, from harvard, oxford, and stanford. do you really think it s appropriate to use your $420,000 salary to attack scientists that disagree with you? the email you re referring to was an email of dr. collins to me.