that decision was an equal protection 14lnth amendment argument. can you equate this like that? that was saying it s not legal to have men allowed into a school. we would be in big trouble. let s make up an analogy. what if one of the lawyers submitted false information knowingly to the supreme court, data about the student body, data about applicants. now you re potentially crossing a line. the other thing that prosecutors will point to is john eastman s involvement in the fake elector scheme. the submission of these forms where trumph electors said we ae the duly elected lelectors, whih they were not. the fake electors, that s the two hooks that prosecutors are going to have to use to say this is not about lawyering. this is about criminality. as you just showed, this is not an easy case for prosecutors.