brian: whoever they are. ainsley: introduce each hour that he wants water and sunrise. brian: i like that. ainsley: brian got snow. will: ski slope. brian: for ainsley. you she misses it. ainsley: i love the snow. every city needs a little bit of snow every winter for the kids. brian: just to hydroplane instead of gripping the road. ainsley: to build a snowman. brian: you have to commit to making a snowman. let me say something? overrated. make one snowman, okay. this is it. ainsley: what about the snow angel? not overrated, that s eadsy. will: that s overrated too. lay in the snow goes up your sleeves and back of your coat. brian: spoken like a guy who never did it in texas. ainsley: welcome. glad you are here this morning. will: on pins and needings to see what it will be like at 8:00 a.m. brian: you re right it will be interesting. ainsley: 8:00. will: asking former presidents and vice presidents if they have any classified documents in
the government we couldn t like take it home with us as our souvenir where he couldn t take it because we wanted to protect and have information against books that might be written one day. those are the most inknock louse explanations of what trump was doing with those documents. the whole system is set up prophylactically to avoid letting government officials do anything like this. that s why the charges have to be brought. that s why it doesn t matter what jury you try this in front of and what judge you try this in front of. this paints a picture of a guy who is going to jail. wow. neil, director john brennan, for all the conversations we ve had with both of you over the years, to have your perspectives and expertise and experience at this moment is really valuable to us. thank you so much for spending time with us today.
this in months to come. what i m concerned about is whether or not the american justice system is capable of actually following through, and making sure there are consequences. the showdown i m wary about is one that pits politics with the justice system. we really are going to see this. it s not a theoretical fight, we ll see this play out in the next 18 months. no, in fact, when trump s going no, like this about the trial. they re gonna try and get that moved. the argument gonna be, of course, this is part of the entire logic of the presidential campaign, which was done prophylactically in part, if reporting is to believed, and just occam s razor, to essentially, provide some kind of immunity or assurance or protection from his criminal trials. when we get to the jack smith situation, i m curious, harry, as someone who worked as both a u.s. attorney and then inside a main justice, what your read on that reporting is about the cement, coming of an end of dot dot dot, some decisions co
what i m getting at here, judges are increasingly showing the trouble they are having in dealing with trump just he is taunting the judge constantly. we are going to keep seeing this in months to come. what i m concerned about is whether or not the american justice system is capable of actually following through, and making sure there are consequences. the showdown i m wary about is one that pits politics with the justice system. we really are going to see this. it s not a theoretical fight, we ll see this play out in the next 18 months. no, in fact, when trump s going no, like this about the trial. they re gonna try and get that moved. the argument gonna be, of course, this is part of the entire logic of the presidential campaign, which was done prophylactically in part, if reporting is to believed, and just occam s razor, to essentially, provide some kind of immunity or assurance or protection from his criminal trials. when we get to the jack smith situation, i m curious, harry, as
in. but we have to figure this out. i know. we have ten minutes, not ten years. i agree. i don t think you can. you had water marks. have any of you been on the facebook page of anyone over 70? of course. and you re going to teach them what between now and i don t think i think you have to play the long game here. i don t think this is a thing you can if you are fundamentally so deep in it that you re into the qanon stuff, you can t get them out. but we can t give up on the concept of treating this prophylactically. we have to look at the future and say the future of people voting in these elections, the people that are going to live for 50-plus years, not just the next 20, those are the people we have to make sure to realize they are going to be creating laws and they ll be the people who realize how this stuff actually works so we can create good things for it.