should be a complete preservation of evidence. do you have any reason to believe they ve destroyed evidence in the meantime? i don t want to get into any of the facts of our investigation. but the request to preserve documents is made prophylactically at the very beginning of an investigation so that we don t have any issue like that come up in the future. are you aware of any information, about contact between russian officials, people tied to the kremlin in any way and the trump campaign during the election season? i m not going to go into any of the specifics. and that would go into the specifics of the investigation. i m not going to comment on that. can you say how the fbi director [ inaudible ]. the chairman says there s no evidence, but is it that the fbi didn t say whether they do or don t have evidence? you don t have any evidence or all i can say is that the director made it clear on this
this is not uncommon in any investigation you want to make sure that the administration and the department is on notice that these are the subject of congressional investigation and that any destruction of records will be a violation of launch so i think it helps clarify if there is mig out a that there should be a complete preservation of evidence. do you have any reason to believe that they have destroyed evidence in the meantime? i i don t want to get into any of the facts of our investigation. but the request to preserve documents is made prophylactically at the very beginning of an investigation is he we don t have any issue like that come up in the future. are you aware of any evidence of contacts between russian officials and people tied to the campaign during the election season? i m not going into the specifics and that would go into
administration? this is not uncommon in any investigation, we want to make sure that the administration and the department is on notice that these are the subjects of the congressional and any destruction will be violation of law. to clarify if there s any ambiguity, there should be a forthcoming of evidence. [inaudible question] i don t want to get into any facts of our investigation, but the request to preserve documents is made prophylactically, it s the very beginning of the investigation so we don t have any issue like that in the future. do you believe the term campaign had contact with the
when it wasn t available, you know, just 20, 30 years ago. we would have never caught this. so i m so grateful. so grateful to them and their sacrifices. there are so many women that are grateful to you for having strong words when it comes to battling breast cancer and being pro-active. there are some that came out and criticized you having your mastectomy saying hey, prophylactically that s not the best way. what do you say to those out there who are really trying to hate on your message and say this isn t the best option for women who are facing cancer? you know, i think it s interesting. a lot of people, when you get tested for your brca gene will just go ahead and do a full hysterectomy and a double mast ektry just in the likelihood or the probability that it will turn into cancer. when you have something in your body that s already well on its way, and it s spreading, i don t know how in good conscience anyone can say, don t be aggressive, don t take care of it. because we al
cable outrage. you go see right there our new graphic. monday, march 10th. we are now a full day into daylight saving time. you know how i know it s daylight saving time? no. not because the clocks changed or i lost an hour of sleep or because it s brighter in the afternoon. no. i know, because about 10,000 people decided it was their duty on twitter to point out to me and the rest of the world that it is daylight saving time. not daylight savings time. there s no s at the end. the mere thought of adding that s is apparently so threatening to so many people that they prophylactically took to twitter at 2:00 a.m. the morning of, just to make sure that no one uses it. now, i have nothing against the proper use of english, and this is no way meant to be anti intellectual. two sentences ago, i used the word prophylactically in a nonsexual way to prove how smart i am. i hate it when people say could care less when they mean couldn t care less.