Property programs for the upkeep of building so that they be in good shape. And what do i tell the 925,000 that goes to really and almost all cases small districts in what they are doing without money. You take care of 12 federal buildings instead of giving them the 925000. Were trying to get rid of these to be clear. To be clear easier at the payments and federal Property Program and moved it to the Facilities Management program. That is typically what you did. The goal is to eventually move properties to local districts. Local districts dont want them today. The other argument to the 67 million you might not agree with that, but the districts lost the Property Tax Base their because of federal activities. Those are one that have resulted in a lot of kids going to school for the Property Tax Bases reduce. Wouldve supported the billion dollars for the Impact Aid Program in the areas where they are having an impact on the student involvement. But what we understand as most of the school
To invest, borrow at negative yield, negative Interest Rates, that is very different i understand your argument but i understand the fear after government that doesnt want to have debttogdp ratio that exceeds 6 . In our government there is no fiscal room for deficit spending program. However, and this is a big however, europe as a whole eurozone as a whole is typified not only by a mountain of great private and public debt, which we do have, but there is another mountain hiding behind this, huge mountain of idle savings with nowhere go and it should be our joint project to energize motivate those idle savings to overcome the great fear that keeps them idle and channel them into protective investments. Not investments into assets but in real productive capacity. How do we do this . We have European Investment bank that could do this. And we have European Central bank embarking on quantitative easing. Why cant they fund a new major deal for europe that channels investment to the private
That is not department of education, its other departments and the government. This is a widely recognized problem that we have, that weve all contributed to including us in congress, those of us who have been in government. So heres my question, would you be willing an example, let me give an example for example when students withdraw from college a portion of their title 4 funds has to be returned to the federal government. Regulatory techs are figuring out what that is, over 200 pages in a handbook. Thats one of the number one objections they have. That could be easily fixed with financial responsibility standards, theres a requirement for audited Financial Statements for private nonprove it and for profit colleges that causes them to get expensive letters of credit according to this report. These requirements by the department dont cause dont follow accepted accounting principles, another one is that when the fapsa, the application for federal grant or loan which is 108 questions i
That is not department of education, its other departments and the government. This is a widely recognized problem that we have, that weve all contributed to including us in congress, those of us who have been in government. So heres my question, would you be willing an example, let me give an example for example when students withdraw from college a portion of their title 4 funds has to be returned to the federal government. Regulatory techs are figuring out what that is, over 200 pages in a handbook. Thats one of the number one objections they have. That could be easily fixed with financial responsibility standards, theres a requirement for audited Financial Statements for private nonprove it and for profit colleges that causes them to get expensive letters of credit according to this report. These requirements by the department dont cause dont follow accepted accounting principles, another one is that when the fapsa, the application for federal grant or loan which is 108 questions i
What were they doing in. They were investigating me. You know i thought i told them, i clearly thought it was a sham. And i expressed that to them on multiple occasions during the investigation. I mean one of the most interesting questions the question they wanted asked or answered the most dealt with the fact i identified a vehicle driving a government vehicle driving at friday night at 8 30 in the evening after i left the office at 8 30 didnt have any taillights on it at all. I stopped that vehicle and notified the driver there werent any taillights on before the driver got on a darkened highway. And then the next monday i inquired about what the vehicle was doing out at 8 30, because you know we had had vehicles destroyed by staff and we had had vehicles used to take staff to crack houses and i had a concern about why that vehicle was out. The oar aib investigation was more concerned excuse me was more concerned why i stopped the vehicle and when i expressed that, you know i was bor