With respect to the appellants allegation that the housing accountability act applies, we would disagree with that assertion. Adding twobedrooms does not make you eligible under the housing accountability act has been the citys position. We do not see this as something you would have to approve, or the Planning Commission will have to approve. Even the unit otherwise we would not be here. Being code compliant, they would not need it for that reason. That is not even what is before anyone, because we have a building that is technically before you. The third unit is again just added. That is not what is on appeal. What is on appeal is the two unit building. The concern of the displacement of the tenant, 30 plus years, as i understand it. The commission did not think that this was appropriate project, the end of the day. They denied the application. I am available for questions. You commented on the haa, which im glad you did. What about the argument that there are constraints on the Plan
Reason. I have a new project that can go back to the commission, rather than a lastminute change to the scope of the project. With respect to the appellants allegation that the housing accountability act applies, we would disagree with that assertion. Adding twobedrooms does not make you eligible under the housing accountability act has been the citys position. We do not see this as something you would have to approve, or the Planning Commission will have to approve. Even the unit otherwise we would not be here. Being code compliant, they would not need it for that reason. That is not even what is before anyone, because we have a building that is technically before you. The third unit is again just added. That is not what is on appeal. What is on appeal is the two unit building. The concern of the displacement of the tenant, 30 plus years, as i understand it. The commission did not think that this was appropriate project, the end of the day. They denied the application. I am available
And determination. There is a lot of new information that the commission may not have had, for whatever reason. I have a new project that can go back to the commission, rather than a lastminute change to the scope of the project. With respect to the appellants allegation that the housing accountability act applies, we would disagree with that assertion. Adding twobedrooms does not make you eligible under the housing accountability act has been the citys position. We do not see this as something you would have to approve, or the Planning Commission will have to approve. Even the unit otherwise we would not be here. Being code compliant, they would not need it for that reason. That is not even what is before anyone, because we have a building that is technically before you. The third unit is again just added. That is not what is on appeal. What is on appeal is the two unit building. The concern of the displacement of the tenant, 30 plus years, as i understand it. The commission did not t
Thank you. The board of supervisors and committees are convening hybrid meeting that allow inperson attendance and Public Comment while Remote Access and Public Comment via telephone. The board recognizes equitable Public Access is essential and will take Public Comment first Public Comment will be taken on each item. Those in person will be allowed to speak first, then take those waiting on the telephone line. When your item of interest comes up, those joining in person should line up to speak and those on the telephone dial star 3 to added to the queue. If on your phone, please remember to turn down your tv and listening devices you may be using. You may submit written Public Comment to the government audit oversight clerk at stephanie. Cabrera sfgov. Org. You may send written comments to our office in city hall at 1 dr. Carlton b goodlett place, room 244, San Francisco california 94102. If you submit Public Comment in writing it will be forwarded to the sfr visors and included as pa
Allow inperson attendance and Public Comment while Remote Access and Public Comment via telephone. The board recognizes equitable Public Access is essential and will take Public Comment first Public Comment will be taken on each item. Those in person will be allowed to speak first, then take those waiting on the telephone line. When your item of interest comes up, those joining in person should line up to speak and those on the telephone dial star 3 to added to the queue. If on your phone, please remember to turn down your tv and listening devices you may be using. You may submit written Public Comment to the government audit oversight clerk at stephanie. Cabrera sfgov. Org. You may send written comments to our office in city hall at 1 dr. Carlton b goodlett place, room 244, San Francisco california 94102. If you submit Public Comment in writing it will be forwarded to the sfr visors and included as part of the file. Items acted upon today are expected to appear on the board of supervi